Recent Posts
18,562 posts(s) found
need usa too
Alguma previsão de sair esta Liga?
Sunderland AFC is selling anyone on the team, send note for inquiries and price you are willing to spend, negotiations are always sellers terms
PSV is selling:
Bibero, 26 yr, D RC, 45M (same as value)
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/240313
Alan Lee, 19 yr, M C, 20M (value 12M)
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/295242
Tomé Porto, 20yr, A LC, 23m (value 18.5M)
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/285989
Peter Post, 20yr, A C, 23M (value 16.5M)
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/289250
I agree with yiu Gabriel, and I think the first 2 steps are:
1- The teams should get/earn money depending on their classification.
2- The problem in the CPU transfers is that this teams should only Buy players in a good business, half of the value price is the top that a CPU team should give for a player… and Back at the last value players… much more realistic…
In this moment I don´t see any human-human transfers…. only CPU-Human because the market in completely inflated by the CPU purchases.
Best Regards
Hello,
No, the only advantage of a higher ranked country is having a higher chance of generating players with high starting skills.
Why? I Insist, I already said this in another topic, this should be affected by the coaching level and the ranking managers too…. like a factor…. 33,33% to each, it´s my opinion.
Best Regards
Fixed!
To fix:
Young players with no future solb by a lot of Millions…
Best Regards
its a shame henk, i had menezes for sale for many ticks, 34 yr old keeper with 90+ stopping power… he went for dirt cheap, 20mil :)
Hi, i am open for friendlies. Just invite me
Also i am looking for an experienced keeper, just let me know if you might have someone interesting.
The game economy certainly needs a review. The CPU teams don’t have any kind of money injection. I’ve started a new design for the economy some months ago but I haven’t gone too far. Your suggestions would be much appreciated mrebello, I’ll contact you directly.
Cheers
Oh, I see the bug you’re referring to (I’m also using Chrome), I’ll try to fix that later today.
No, the only advantage of a higher ranked country is having a higher chance of generating players with high starting skills. Assuming a player from Turkey and one from Spain start with the same skills they will have equal chance of development, meaning both could have a similar development or either one of them could get better than the other at the end.
Hello,
Like I already said in another topics:
1- The teams should get/earn money depending on their classification.
2- The problem in the CPU transfers is that this teams should only Buy players in a good business, half of the value price is the top that a CPU team should give for a player… and Back at the last value players… much more realistic…
At this moment I think this is the 2 priority changes.
Best Regards
i put my young goal (20 yrs) 92 keeping, in loan. if you want
Anyone wants to loan out a young keeper with around 90 in keeping? I pay 100% wage. Cheers
When doing things, why not do them properly.
CPU teams would not pay anything at all if they can have cheaper players, and there are a lot of cheaper players around.
BK
i see a top priority above all, danilo:
CPU teams shouldn’t pay more then, let’s say 5/10m, for a player. with those crazy transfers, there are human managers paying more then 100m for normal players
Each season, the average size of stadiums in a league is higher (assuming that there are teams paying to expand the stadium). This also means that normally the average attendance is higher. This means that the average income is higher.
There you have your inflation!
i agree with vaughn… this kind of limitation means country with highest ranking will have unfair advantage…
A few days back we had a poll on if managers could have a say on player growth or to keep it as it is currently.
i have one suggestion regarding that. as we know on an average an outfield player improves 140 skill points and 120 points if he is a goalkeeper. my suggestion is to allow random growth pattern (ie as current ) for 90% for the skill points. and for give managers control for the last 10%. ( if it is possible to implement.)
we can debate on how we can manage the optimum balance between basic growth and specialization..
For eg; it could be 90% random and 10% to managers by default … or if you have level 10 coaching you can have more control over specialization.
or alternately, if you pay for the game, you can have more control.
we also need to look after fake accounts or people having multiple accounts trying to sabotage players for other teams.
Finally, my point is,
As it is, i like the current system of random growth… but if we are moving towards letting managers manage the growth pattern, lets make it such that manager have only some controls, not full control… because as we all know, life is random.
I am a bit concerned about the economy of the game. CPU teams seem to keep spending money recklessly buying any player that is not too expensive. I wonder if this is sustainable? Do CPU teams have an injection of money from time to time?
I have an Economics degree from uni, so maybe I could make suggestions about some issues like inflation. I would need to better understand the basics of how things work first though.
Cheers
Hmm when I posted here didn’t show up the same way that it does in my ‘players’ menu.
It says something like: ‘Racing Club Ferrol’ ….
Maybe it’s my browser. I use google chrome
If you go to to menu ‘players’ in my team, and then click the ‘Contracts’ tab, there is a bug with the loaned players. Example:
Jokin Postigo G 23
Loaned from Racing Club Ferrol
241 $12,154 $138,676,335
Xisto Esteves G 24 Season 64, Turn 82 147 $11,082 $16,840,151
→ The first player is my loaned in goalkeeper. The second is my own player (note the bug when stating the team that I loaned my keeper from).
yup :)
Ah, wait, there isn’t. It’s still 3 minimum, but if you look during a tick, it will be 1!
Right?
There has been a slight change, hasn’t there? I saw players with 1 stamina, while in the past I think 3 was the minimum.
Oh, thanks for that Gabriel. The player improved (and very little) after like 35 friendlies or so. I then proceeded to sell the player asap! haha I didn’t know this rule.
I try to buy young players to make them improve, but I really don’t know which one would be potentially good. First criterion I used was the current skills + how much experience the player has + the coaching level of their current team. But apparently their starting ‘Value’ may be important too..
Do players from the high ranked have a better chance to improve? What i mean is, say you have bought two players that are 17 years old. One from Spain and one from Turkey. They have the same skills and obviously will go through the same coaching level at your team. Will the Spanish player have a higher chance to be better at the end?? Thanks.
I imagine your player must have developed by now, right? Just a quick explanation, in the current system (which we are planning to change as Danilo pointed out) when you hire a new player his next improvement is still bound to his previous team’s coaching level, after that he will be bound to your team’s coaching level.
Indeed, thanks a lot everyone! I know I haven’t been active lately but there are several reasons behind that, the main one being I changed cities and needed a lot of time to settle down. As of yesterday I’ve finally got internet connection at home, so now I’m officially ready to get back into the game ;-)