Recent Posts
18,548 posts(s) found
If I remember correctly 35 is the minimum. My rules are setup at 45.
Berhan and Davison showing some love as usual.
It is hard to come to the forums when I haven’t completed what I intended yet. Of course I spend some time in game as I do that as a past time as I would any other online game. On the bright side, spending time playing RubySoccer made it even more clear to me that fixing the economy is truly the highest priority.
Cheers
Your spelling sucks as usual but who cares, also you should try typing that in the right forum then we would know why you are silent. ;)
On the other hand, let’s keep the charade a bit longer, maybe he will commit suicide soon.
Hello,
How many minutes have to be played by players to “gain” the improvment ? 45 ? 30 ? 15 ?
Thanks for your answer, that will help me to edit my substitution rules.
berhan take your isis supporting ass and go fuck yer self
Guys, this IS so cruel, should we let Davison know that then whole thing is setup to piss him off?!
/BK
what the fuck
IS IT THAT HARD ? one post
Right now players retire at age 36-40 years.
I think its kinda unrealistic, specially when players lost to much skills after age of 30.
An exception would be for star player to retire at older age but at max 36 or even at 34.
When the player reaches older age he will get diffirent position/role to play.
You could maybe add a change that will force managers to sell players at earlier stage of the players career.
Money is worthless right now.
Managers need options to spend money, not just buying /selling bad players.
/carecup empty
I won the Euro cup and was mid table, sounds like a foolish move to me, but maybe I’m biased.
To be honest if the board think your doing a bad job then they should replace you. Sounds realistic to me!
So that is a polite way of saying, “someone applied for your job.” I have no real problem with this, it’s annoying but if you ever go to a pay to play model I’m guessing you’d have to remove this, otherwise there will be some unhappy customers.
If we had 32 countries we would have a group stage ;-)
You’re only sacked when you go below 1% and someone with a better manager ranking than you is applying for your job. If you go below 1% and nobody better than you is applying your rating goes back to 1%.
Cheers
As you guys may have guessed from my lack of updates I haven’t been able to spend much time on RubySoccer development in the last couple weeks. I’ve been working extra hours on my “real life” job and have been completely drained of energy to work here. I was even fired for inactivity on MediumTicker…lol
This is hilarious, it sounds like:
“I asked 31 number of girls to sleep with me and only one agreed while my friend asked 7 and 3 of them agreed, so I am quitting and start to play for the other team!” :)
So good luck with whatever you do! :D
/BK
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/4440338
One of the reasons to quit… what is this? Last WC and European champion gets knocked out like this?…
Why can´t WC starts with a group stage like reality?..
I think it’s the board, I’m not 100%.
Does the board sack you, or is it a case of someone applying for your job when you are less than 10% in favour with the board?
I have been sacked from both games in the past month and would be interested to know if it was people applying for my job or the board actually sacking me.
Yeah, I agree with you Berhan, introducing the money back will bring with it problems we wanted to get rid of (inflation, cheating) so we will have to introduce something else with it. I like your suggestions here and might pick some of them to start with, such as wage match by other players and lower morale for having too many players of the same position. It is probably the toughest on the list, but also the one I feel needed working the most as having no money balance had more negative than positive impacts overall, even though introducing the Investments was something I really liked.
Cheers
Oh, you chose the toughest of all features to change.
That one needs serious design dude.
For example people will abuse it to buy free/cheap mediocre players and sell it for twice the money, so you have to add penalties on morale so as I see it you have to release the MORALE enabled at the same time.
Some other considerations to make:
1) When buying a player what will the player have impact on:
a) Role model for younger players (max skill + 5%?)
b) Wage issues with other players, similar skilled will want a new contract to match the new guys pay
c) If more than 3 players on certain position, morale will go down on certain players, as will their development ratio
2) Answer to this logical question: was this a good move for the club?
a) see 1/c
b) skill/potential-wise is this player better than the rest of the players already in the club?
c) set an arbitrary nr of years/season before player is sell-able, depending on the quality of the player?!
- need to explain this one. Normally a manager should be able to bid on ANY player, even if player is not transferlisted. 2c will ensure that certain players can not be bid on for a certain period of time, if the player is too good for the club.
3) Answer to this logical question: was this a good move for the player?
a) yes money is great, role promised is captaincy and highest earner clause is ON.
b) specially 32+ year old players, can jump into coaching later on, and I realize this is asking for a feature, but this can be explored
c) age/skill/country-wise is it interesting for a player to move to your club? The big-club thing in SoccerSim comes into mind..
4) Answer to this logical question: is the player willing to work for you?
a) what kind of manager are you? a Developer of stars, “Cow trader”, a winner of titles?
b) depending on ages/skill the player could change view in his life and may change opinion about you?
c) newspaper feature bump, player interview where player stating that he would want to work with manager/club/league…shouldn’t be too hard to implement.
Bringing back just the money will change nothing, sure you could save 5Bn and buy whoever but that brings back the reason to cheat.
Some thoughts anyway.
/BK
We’ll keep investments and put back the club money concept. I still need to figure out a way to keep the transfer and wage budgets at the same time, but if it proves to be too complicated I’ll just get rid of them, at least for now.
The squad size limit should be removed once player morale is implemented. As we have a very limited amount of time to dedicate to the game at the moment we are trying to focus on one thing at a time and the highest priority from the poll seems to be the club money, followed by player morale and match engine.
There was mention that squad sizes might be increased or the limit on the number of players being removed at some point, I think this was at the same time as player moral was meant to be rolled out. Is this idea of an increased squad size still being thought about or considered?
and investments ? i would like to see: investments stay, a return of the club money and have player moral
It’s not! I’ve just released the latest poll results, check it out:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/forums/5/topics/1078
What would you like us to change or introduce in the game?
20% – Change match engine from simulation to statistics based
33% – Bring back the club money balance
20% – Finish introducing player morale
10% – Increase the number of clubs in the Club World Cup
11% – Management cycles: after a fixed number of seasons everyone has to apply for jobs again
6% – No Answer
I’ll focus the little time I have on bringing back the money concept. At the same time I’ll try to introduce some measures to contain inflation. I’ll try to keep the transfer and wage budgets at the same time, if possible.
Cheers