Recent Posts
18,542 posts(s) found
welcome…any news on the consequences? i won the return match but ofcourse i couldnt beat a 9-0 so i’m knocked out of the cup….
Hi,
My team is Norwich City (England, Division 1) on the Medium Ticker.
In the league game on Turn 24 against Reading, the match report details that I had a 4-5-1 formation. However, I never use 4-5-1, I always use 4-4-2, and I’m sure I specifically went into that match with 2 strikers: V. Fries and G. Amaro. The system seems to have included a midfielder, Hugo Tiago Mota, who I subbed out of my team yesterday, in place of Volker Fries.
My Formations screen shows that for my Default formation I have a 4-4-2 formation – and the only change I’ve made since the match on turn 24 is to swap one defender for another. I haven’t changed the midfield or attackers.
I can’t prove any of the above, so it’ll be easy to say “Oh, you must be mistaken”, but I’m sure there is a problem here.
If there is any auditing or change logging on your database you’ll be able to see that I have only made defensive changes to the Default formation since Turn 24.
@Alexandre:
Yeah at Sporting we need players, but good ones… And we also could use a new coach. One who isn’t so stuburn and uses a god soccer tactic like 442, 433 or a simple 4132. Or coach loves the 112 tactic way too much… (for those who doesn’t know and may miss the Ironic Mode here, 112 its the emergency phone number in Europe)
Sorry for the OT :)
@Gabriel:
A 3 turn negotiation may help to prevent these cases. At least one doesn’t get cought with the trousers on his ands… :)
In the rules department, a manager should have a valid reason to drop a bid. For example, the selling manager doesn’t want this player to be purchased by a direct opponent in his division, or in his contry or in Champions league, is in his right to do so. It should also exist a confirmation button to prevent “accidental bid drops” or “Transfer List acidental removals”… ;)
Cheers
yeah, i do miss the board :|
The player was removed and then put back in the transfer list. Looks like an arranged transfer. I apologize if that’s not the case. Anyway, this won’t be a problem anymore when the transfers negotiations last at least 3 turns as we’ve made with loans.
I’m sorry that happened to you :-(
Cheers.
ahaha antonio, at least he was transfered for sporting!!!!
think about it, sporting does need new players!
cheers
The objectives will be a good addition, for sure!
Sounds good Philipp, I’ll add that to our list.
FastTicker – Season 3, Turn 44 / 144
Negotiation cancelled Assistant 43
“From: Assistant
Subject: Negotiation cancelled
Our negotiations with Juan Gallipoli were cancelled. The player has been removed from the transfer list."
Well, if the player was removed from the Transfer List, how come the player gets transfered during the same turn?
We are now in turn 44 wich hasn’t reached it’s end. So, during turn 43 the player was removed from the Transfer List by Napoli’s manager and then, miraculously, gets transferred to Sporting.
I’m suuuure, this was just an “innocent mistake”…
Bankrupcy is imho clearly the first one! :)
The next could be objectives, have the board ask you for a specific league place, comparing your squad with the rest of your league. Something like “Win the title”, where you’d have to at least stay on the top 3, “Among the top” for at least 7th or 8th, or lets say international cups, “Middle in Table” for 7th-14th and “Avoid Relegation” for… guess! ;)
Cheers.
guess b/c it’s a “friendly” – think about it: who cares about friendlies (or the B team plying in minor leagues) in RL?
But if not already implemented, i would suggest to depend attendance from the “glory” the opponent has. Matches against teams who are top in their leagues, won several National titles and in best cases, won CL should be attended by a bigger crowd than normal.
In Fulltest friendlies against minor teams had 2000-7000 visitors, when you played ManUtd or Lazio (both very succesfull in FT) you had like 20000-30000 people coming to your test matches.
Why the attendence of friendly is so low?
My last friendly was with an attendence of 3500
Managers are not fired for going bankrupt yet. The only change recently made is that the system blocks an offer for a player not only if you don’t have the transfer value, but also if your money less the sum of your open proposals is not enough to pay the transfer value. For example, if you have 2.5M and have an offer for a 2M player you won’t be able to make another offer for a player being sold for more than 0.5M
We need to work on reasons for firing managers, bankruptcy could be the first one :-)
Cheers.
I might have missed an announcement, but is it still the case that managers can spend $$$$$ on players wages and have negative finances, or has the game been changed so that bankrupt clubs fire the managers?
A blank page could work…and the xls thing for a specific country is not that bad if you think that can be done manually country by country…but I’m still not fully comfortable with the ideia :-)
Cheers.
Perhaps you can create an intermediate stage, like a blank page with country information or anything fast to load, then and there, the user can choose which one wants… All/Free/Sale… really fast to transfer page, user can choose which category wants to see first.
Due to the amount of teams and squad limitation, a lot of people should be watching free transfers permanently (I would if I had money), I think this could light the server as the transfer pages wouldn’t be needed to load unless users requested so…
Even to build my .xls I prefer to copy from All instead of pasting Transfers and then Frees…
And the button to e-mail players is not that lazy, if you look at it, it’s almost the same thing as having filters to search players, like an advanced search… I just didn’t request the filters but the whole instead as it is easier, but this filters with so many teams and players will tend to exist… Cheers :)
About the default filter: I changed it to Transfers to speed up the screen in the first access, so those who doesn’t want to see all types of transfers could reach the desired screen in less time.
About the transfers email: really lazy way, huh? :-) It certainly would make the server work lighter, but would spoil the fun of looking for a good player on different countries, specially when more countries are added.
Cheers.
These filters are nice, improvements are great but these pages will always be the slowest of them all! wouldn’t it be possible to have a single button to get all current players at market arriving in your e-mail? And this is to say that we would have to login and inside the game press the button to get an e-mail!
Or process the thing like x time (defined) before ticking I would get that e-mail, in a really lazy way!
Wouldn’t this make the server work lighter? A csv, or a xls :)))))) I would understand if I had to receive an advertised e-mail with the players at market attached in .xls :))))))
Hello,
one sugestion, the default filter in the transfer/loan list should be all, at least as i see it.
keep up the good work
not planning to :) we will try to improve that screen without having to do that.
Don’t paginate the transfers/loans, please. :)
That would work, Samir… for now. Once we are able to make our own offers instead of just bidding what the selling team is asking, that would spoil the fun of waiting for the final minute of the final tick to raise your offer and become the highest bidder, therefore negotiating alone. ;)
I think it should always close 3 turns after the first bid comes in, to prevent what Philipp is saying. In that case, if player X is listed for 20M, there must be a bid of 20M… and if at 2,95 turns the seller lowers it to 1M, the bidding team will still have to pay the 20M, or drop that bid and make a new one of 1M, restarting the 3 turn count (assuming he was the only one bidding, so the player wouldn’t have any bid when he dropped the 20M one).
Hope i made any sense on this lol
Another thing… 6 turns could be the default before the bids close, and the manager could have the option to change that from 3 to 9, similar to what we had in SS, it could go from 1 week to… not sure, never tried the most of it, but we could at least 1 month.
Cheers.
I think the three turns period should start over if any parameter for sell/loan is changed. If the selling price changed , the loan period or the salary percent. It should stay on the list for 3 turns completely unchanged.
understood, Gabriel. But what if: playe X is listed 2,95 turns for 20M (worth ~2M) and 5 minutes before 3 turns are over the seller lowers minimum to 1M. His friend enters 1M & the deal’s done.
personally i think it should be at least 3 ticks in every situation, does not matter the time the players has been in transfer list.
cheers
I have just thought of another suggestion to this 3 ticks minimum. If you make a proposal to a player that has been in the transfer list for more than 3 turns things will work exactly as they are working now: if the player accept any proposal he will go be transfered during the tick. If there are proposals to a player who has been in the transfer list for less than 3 turns he there will be no reply on the proposals until 3 turns have passed since he was transfer listed. After that he will be transfered to the team who offered the best proposal or reply to all teams with a new proposal, if no proposal was accepted. That will we would prevent instant or “arranged” transfers, which I believe is the goal of this 3 ticks minimum discussion. What do you guys think? (Loans would be changed to work the same way also)
Show a player count on players screen.
Hotlists, hotlists…no, we didn’t have that on our list, but I’ve just added :-)
Cheers.
first the transfer listing time should be postponed – like i suggested in another thread ~3ticks minimum.
i see a problem in your case, matty. what if someone bids on my players and i’m not online to check which bidders i wanna drop. like my “rival” bid just 1 minute before tick closing … therefore a block/boycott function would be still usefull.
i agree. it should cost some effort yourself to have an advantage on information (like player imrovements). Not everything should be be tansparent/visualized out-of-the-box.