just saw this was addressed in a “suggestion” message.
That’s mostly because we are ‘used’ to consider these things (tactics/formation and players) as different things in the game. So we set up the team’s formation, and the players were assigned to the positions we decided before.
Here, it’s much more like managerzone, I guess. The players themselves determine the team’s formation.
I believe players are being overrated
just played a 0×0 friendly, and here are the ratings:
G Orlando Carvalho 10.0
D Raul Pessoa 10.0
D Adalberto Nascimento 7.2
D Euclides Ventura 6.8
D Mauro Cotrim 9.1
M Jeremias Gaspar 10.0
M Adílson Cunha 10.0
M Lourenço Guimarães 8.7
A Félix Rios 5.8
A Felipe Bernardes 10.0
A Duarte Araújo Player_yellow_card 4.2
G Inácio Batista 7.1
D Orlando Marinho 9.9
D Sandro Brito 10.0
D Vítor Reis 10.0
D Cristiano Salazar 10.0
D César Lousada 9.7
M Cristóvão Nóbrega Player_yellow_card 10.0
M Tomás Pacheco 10.0
M Manuel Bernardes 5.9
M Fábio Amado 10.0
A Bento Pedroso 9.8
nice
More attributes will certainly be added to that box somehow. About player numbering we’re not sure, but we’ll have a way to identify who is selected to the next match in the players screen.
We have history in the future, not only for teams, but also for players, transfers and so on.
Select all is already there, but it is called “invert selection”, it marks all unmarked and unmarks all marked messages…only the mark as read may be missing I guess.
Exactly Thiago, and when you create a new tactic it is not displayed right away, you must click on it before.
Had the same problem: you must create the tactic before saving, it’s different from what we had in Soccersim, which we could create a new tactic while we saved it.
How about a “select all” box (to check) and “mark as read”. Small things, great help
how about that team’s history page like we had in soccersim?
with titles, transfers etc etc
i think age and stamina is important to see on the formation screen. Sometimes we wish to set formations based on stamina.
How about Numbers for our players, when you put them in formation they get the number for that position.
Then if you could get these numbers to automatically show up in the ‘Players’ tab area we would be able to see who was playing next match easier and move people around easier.
Could maybe add more attributes like age to the box that opens when you move your mouse over a player in the formations area, I think adding age will be a good idea.
I got Internacional.
But they are a good side.
MS had a numeric attribute like our stamina as well, the ideia is the same.
The formation screen players are now sorted by its main attribute.
Defenders: Tackle
Attackers: Shooting
MidF : Passing
GoalKeepers: Ke.
Enjoy!
I wanted to thank America-RN for borrowing my team the best (shooting) attacker in the world, to lead my team to victory against São Caetano on the cup. Unfortunetely, the bug is now fixed.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/773
I received 2 mails for the same message as well. (in-game message from a user)
yes i agree with you ricardo, must have the team name… and it should have more space between wage transfer price etc. :) i have said it before and you agreed gabriel :)
welcome stephen :)
Stamina is the same as condition. In managersim, it could be regular, good, very good, superb…. Maybe we will have words for it someday. (is this a bug ? :) )
Dont know if this is a bug, but is stamina the same as condition ?
If my players play a game they’re condition should drop slightly before they rest and it improves.
Is there no condition in ruby soccer ?
I’m glad to see some people here that were active on MS forums :D
Yeah, lots of history stuff to do as well :-)
Your first result has probably been considered :-)
Fixed.
Just posted in the announcements forum, had to postpone the ticks due to some fixes I did last ninght.
Sorry, we missed two ticks due to some fixes I did last night. Back to normal now.
I don’t think they be added in Beta 1, but on the next dimension we create (if Beta 1 becomes full) or when we reset Beta 1, no estimate for that to happen yet.
Woodhead, is that you? :-)