Recent Posts by Ulisses
271 posts(s) found
Have you tried 3×5×2 or 3×6×1?
Middlefilders are too much important now. M+1 and M+0 it is good for good shooters too.
Very often my strikers are missing penalty kicks even with 100 shooting and 96 control. It is far from realistic world. Like my last match: http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/658206
Thanks, it will worth.
Mine one has dropped 33%!!!! just in 4 official matches. From 100% to 67%
Definitely I need this improvement. With arrange friendlies at season begining I have set my default formation to friendlies. And have set (by hand) all official games with my official formation.
The problem is that cup league just show future games after you win the last one and I have played my semifinal with a very stupid formation, so I loose 19×0! and my director board ration has dropped from 100% to 81%.
Could you please implement 2 options of formations: one for official games and another for friendlies?
Thanks
A little fix could be make striker shooting more than middlefielders. It is awkward see my middlefielders shooting as much as my strikers
Goalkeeper skills 95+ with less then 32 years old will be expensive. You can try to buy veterans.
I will be nice and post some options:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/54535 12M
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/64806 8M
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/65126 5M
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/47719 8M
Better then this ones just paying more than 15M for sure.
They are not so effective anymore, but they can still helping a lot. Unfortunally they have to be really, really good to make difference.
Yep, it is a good suggestion. I think someone already have suggested it.
Gabriel, could you get this statistics from last 72 turns? Your update hasn´t been on the begining of the season. (And just official matchs).
Last turn at spain we had:
9 goals by strikers
8 goals by middlefielders
4 goals by defenders
MOTM
4x goalkeepers
4x middle
2x def
0x strikers
@Nirabdha, I´m not complaining about match result. I just want to alert Gabriel that goalkeepers are getting very often MOTM. They are making too much difference. A lot of times they compensate a weak defence line. (not your case)
More one time boring game 0×0: http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/614609
and again the goalkeeper was the MOTM!
I can´t afford striker 100 shooting, 100 dribble and 100 control :P for make games more interesting
BTW my last league game we have again goalkeeper MOTM: http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/599898
Boring game 0×0 : http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/599858
More one time goalkeeper is the MOTM and compensate his weak defense
I know sometimes rand() my players don´t play well, but my two goalkeepers with average skills 94 and 93 (pretty good isn´t it?) had grades 4.9 and 5.7 in the same match.
And his goalkeeper has grade 10.0 with average skill 86!
The worst is 4 goals from players shooting skills: 73, 75, 72, 90 (ok, 90 is fine!) And I was playing with my first class defenders.
Maybe 1×0 or 2×0 would be more reasonable.
About “Schedule friendlies on season start”: is it scheduling home and aways or is it like the unfair way with computer team playing allways home and other away?
I have requested a player (was the first one). 100% wage and my negociation has failed. I was the first to request this player. What is the criteria?
Since new match engine update my players grade has fallen 30%. Strikers are not working anymore and I lost the last game by a goal from a middle fielder with 78 shooting skill.
I ll have to think again about my tatics
We are having more “cold” matchs now. Last turn at Primeira Division (Spain) we had 3 matchs 0 × 0
But they are too good. It dosent make any difference if your shooting long or short. Actually it is better to use long distance because you have more chance with more shoots. If you are face-to-face with the goalkeeper you should almost always score, but this rarely happens.
Who is responsible to hold the striker is the defence line, not the goalkeepers. Dribble should be less effective and tackle more effective at defence field. So defenders could stop strikers. And avoid the very very often situation face-to-face striker w/ goalkeepers. This will avoid too the famous 4×4×2 with rare pass: striker C0 or C1 gets the ball at middlefield and dribble everyone until reach the goal and shot.
It is hard to belive that a defence line with skills 80+ can be compensated with a goalkeeper 100 with more than 30 great defences.
The goalkeeper should receive a bonus if there is 1, 2 or 3 defenders near striker at the shooting moment, but negative bonus otherwise.
What is sad that is happening is a running for great goalkeepers, what it is bad because you can spend 50M in a goalkeeper and 10M in 4 average defenders. I think it is sad not because I dont have great goalkeepers, but it makes the ruby less fun: just get the better goalkeepers possible and take care of your middle and attack field.
Last EL match I was very surprised (my board too, they took me 9%).
I was shooting with 3 strikers with shooting skills: 94, 93, 96 and his goalkeeper has 100 as goal as 93 speedy
I coundn´t make ANY goal
In the other hand he was shooting with striker skills: 84 and 83!!!!!!! and my goalkeeper has 95 as goal and 100 speedy
He made 3 goals
What is hard to belive it is my 4 defenders tackle skills: 98, 97, 96, 94
agains his defenders with tackle skills: 84, 88, 90, 97
Match report: http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/594341
It is not supposed to goalkeeper get tired after a lot of shots?
Just to everyone knows that he is THE striker!
But if you have 120M you can try to bid him.
It has been a long time since portuguese wiki page is a mess
http://www.rubysoccer.com/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page
Revert and lock it. So just who have signed up for more than 1 week can change it.
Real Madrid was trainning his youths. He can´t either go to 2nd division or qualify to EL. So at least I think he is trying to improve his youths.
If you don´t know too much about a player you will have to guess if he is under developed.
If you know how many games he have played and the coach level in his history per season is it is too easy to know about it.
So we have to think what it is more fun.
Interesting. Maybe just 1 or 2 transfter if it is a fresh/novice manager
If manager has more than 3 seasons he can trade 4 players
I´m very surprise with my last game against Real Madrid in FT.
Our first match I win (3×5) playing as guest. The second playing home and with a new and much better goalkeeper I lost (1×2). All my team have crap scores comparing with other games. We both play almost with the same squad and formation and all my player were playing with 97+ stamina
We need to come up with new ideas about free transfer / player owners.
Normally if a good/great player leave his team (brake contract or end contract) he goes to “gray” market. What happened is that this good/great player receive a lot of proposals and his wage go to $100,000. Thinking about soccer player side, why he will renew a contract to earn 22,000 if he can go to the gray market and receive 100k? It is a very unrealist situation. A striker with 94+ skills in avarage can make much more than 100k per 3 turns. Players like Alberto Chavez will never renew a contract.
What do you think about it?
(I´ll show some ideas later. I want to know some opinios first)
It would be nice if we could set our team until next tick :P
Probably you have too many players at transfer or loan list. Remove one from transfer list and try to fire your GK
Juscelino Magalhães – 26 years old – 5,5M
98 dribble, 91 pass, 90 control, 87 shooting