Recent Posts

Subscribe to Recent Posts 18,554 posts(s) found

January 18, 2008 07:15

23 posts(s)

 

I won the bundesliga last year but i dont see any matches for it :(

Also GM’s would talk about my formation bug and the knock out that followed on that in the cup…

 

January 18, 2008 06:40

20 posts(s)

 

Hi guys

I don’t know if anyone else have had the same problem, but I want to complain because I haven’t been able to connect to rubysoccer for two days (I guess that it was due to the new server) The problem is that I have played two league games with my “B” squad (and obviously I have lost both).

I’m sure you’ll agree that it isn’t fair and that something must be done.

Cheers

 

January 17, 2008 21:03

7 posts(s)

 

Hi!

I don’t know if you are aware but it is possible to, step by step, increase the maximum wage you can offer for a player… it’s just a matter of trying many times, with different values. Please fix this, so this good new rule may have the desired effect!

=)

 

January 17, 2008 17:04

1,003 posts(s)

Administator

 

We are on a new server. Please give us your feedback (about the browsing experience) on the forum.

 

January 17, 2008 10:26

13 posts(s)

Donator

 

True. Fixtures page now loads as fast as any other.

Thx.

 

January 16, 2008 23:22

1,003 posts(s)

Administator

 

Nice! I was changing some web server internal configurations and database structure details – it should be better now!

cheers

 

January 16, 2008 22:47

13 posts(s)

Donator

 

Navigation on the New Server is better. Transfer/loans pages load faster. In the formation screen, assigning players is much faster now. The fixtures page is the slowest one, about 20 seconds to open.

Cheers

 

January 16, 2008 21:43

4,310 posts(s)

Administator

 

New manager applications and resignation rules:

-a manager hired by a team must stay at least 36 turns on that team
-a manager cannot apply for a team he has managed in the last 144 turns

 

January 16, 2008 18:52

1,003 posts(s)

Administator

 

Already on the new host! Feedback, please!

cheers

 

January 16, 2008 12:16

803 posts(s)

 

We can see that information cheking the player’s previous team matches, but is to much work :P

I think it would be good even for the game, because managers would search and contract more players with less skills knowing they haven’t evolved nothing yet.

Lets hear other opinions :D

 

January 16, 2008 09:37

387 posts(s)

 

friendly statistics: yes, please!

 

January 16, 2008 09:11

1,003 posts(s)

Administator

 

Tomorrow we will be on a new server. Once more we will need your feedback after the move. We will massmail everybody when that happens.

cheers

 

January 16, 2008 06:34

4,310 posts(s)

Administator

 

A friend of mine suggested that. I know it would be useful when buying a player for instance, but I have my doubts if not knowing it is good for the game. Anyway, let’s discuss that and see what everybody think about it :-D

Cheers!

 

January 16, 2008 06:03

803 posts(s)

 

Hi, I think it would be usefull to have the friendlies a player played in his history. There could be a filter to choose the kind of matches he played.

I think it is usefull when we search for young players on free transfer list we could see how many maches they played, friendlys and serious ones :D

Cheers

 

January 15, 2008 20:53

124 posts(s)

 

I need friendlies again.

Portsmouth, FastTicker.

 

January 15, 2008 17:07

387 posts(s)

 

Alright, Gabriel. Thanks for explaining.
cheers

 

January 15, 2008 16:27

4,310 posts(s)

Administator

 

No Philipp, another goalie will be used to replace the banned one or, if no goalie is available, the available player with the highest keeping :-)

What Alexandre meant is the “best” available player no matter the position to replace. So in your case you had a banned midfielder and got a striker to replace him. That means your “best” available striker (highest shooting) was better than your “best” available midfielder (highest passing), if you compare the striker shooting with the midfielder passing. Of course this “best” concept is far from accurate and also that is not what you wanted, you wanted your formation to be 3-5-2 and that’s what’s gonna happen when we fix it.

Cheers!

 

January 15, 2008 13:44

387 posts(s)

 

it’s not that sytem picks the best player available, but that the system doesn’t replace the missing player at his original position … what if a goalie is banned? do the system steps up with a 3-5-3 …?!

 

January 15, 2008 12:04

223 posts(s)

 

the a.i picks the best player available no matter the position he plays….

gabriel will fix this in the future.

cheers

 

January 15, 2008 04:31

6 posts(s)

 

Totally agree my team can not score a goal, 8 goals all season many diffrent styles of attack tried and still no goals, a typical game my last one: Newcastle United

G Steve Gibbs 10.0
D Ben Eaton 7.7
D John Bull 6.7
D Felipe Franco 7.2
D Joey Stark 9.2
D Ian Roberts 10.0
M Sean Taylor 10.0
M Wayne Benson 5.2
M Steve Betts 8.9
A John Robinson 10.0
A Darren Green 10.0
1 × 0

5-3-2 formation 4-4-2
44% possession 56%
16 shots 33
11 shots on target 14
64% accurrate passes 58%
62% effective tackles 67%
3 corners 2
1 offsides 6
22 fouls 30
Blackburn Rovers

G George McGowan 8.2
D Emilio Palumbo 10.0
D Martin Haydon 10.0
D Tony Goodyear 9.8
D Bruno Rui Silva 9.0
M Nicolau Castilho 3.5
M Graeme Smith 9.3
M Andrea Bartolucci 9.9
M Andrés Perez De Cabrera 10.0
A Orlando Armstrong 10.0
A Victor Naves 10.0

1 min: The referee shows Castilho (a) a yellow card.

18 min: The referee shows B. Eaton (h) a yellow card.
29 min: The referee shows J. Stark (h) a yellow card.
39 min: The referee shows S. Betts (h) a yellow card.
57 min: Taylor (h) scores

 

January 14, 2008 10:59

4,310 posts(s)

Administator

 

Another controversial point Filipe, whether or not national teams will have managers. When the time comes we’ll see :-)

Cheers.

 

January 14, 2008 10:56

4,310 posts(s)

Administator

 

Makes sense Filipe, it will probably work this way.

Cheers!

 

January 14, 2008 08:03

803 posts(s)

 

If you implemt national teams will they have real managers? I think it would be great if the best managers could be at same time on their clubs and a national team.

Hope you guys don’t give up this one :D

Cheers

 

January 14, 2008 07:26

803 posts(s)

 

It would be nice if national players can adapt faster and better than foreigners. So managers woul prefer to contract them.

 

January 14, 2008 07:16

803 posts(s)

 

If possible don’t change it this season, or some managers will have some problems. Me included :D

Keep the good work!

 

January 13, 2008 15:19

4,310 posts(s)

Administator

 

Understood Filipe :-)

You’re right, sometimes they accept these 50% reduction. We’ll have to work this out.

Cheers.

 

January 13, 2008 12:33

37 posts(s)

 

I came across this topic only today, but I have to say that the same thing happened to me, when I was trying to buy 3 players from Borussia Dortmund. So I checked Borussia’s page and… surprise:

3
48 Alex Touluca Manager Resigned.
44 Alex Touluca Manager Contracted.

The biography of this nomade coach:

Season Turn Team Event
3
62 Roma Manager Contracted.
61 Le Mans Manager Resigned.
55 Le Mans Manager Contracted.
54 Sunderland Manager Resigned.
49 Sunderland Manager Contracted.
48 Borussia Dortmund Manager Resigned.
44 Borussia Dortmund Manager Contracted.

…and his twin, Alex Foutura:

Season Turn Team Event
3
62 Banfield Manager Contracted.
61 Real Sporting de Gijón Manager Resigned.
55 Real Sporting de Gijón Manager Contracted.
54 Athletic Bilbao Manager Resigned.
49 Athletic Bilbao Manager Contracted.
48 Auxerre Manager Resigned.
44 Auxerre Manager Contracted.

Just to make sure everybody is aware. Cheers!

 

January 13, 2008 07:52

803 posts(s)

 

Gabriel Cesario he won’t accept reduce to his normal wage, but still accept a big reduction. I don’t know exactly how many, but for example in my last team Braga they accepted about 50% wage reduction. I think this is not realistic, expecialy if the players played almost every match with a good rating. If he has a good avarage rating and he plays many maches he shold not accept any reduction. This way we won’t offer unrealistic wages when the contract is made.

In your exemple, if the player has a good rating and he played most of the games he would ask the same wage he had (100,000). If he does not play he should accept a reduction, but not much, about 10%, so he would ask 90,000.

This way we would not offer that much (100,000) to a player which accept 10,000 and wages would be more stable and realistics.

Hope you understand my english :D

 

January 13, 2008 07:32

4,310 posts(s)

Administator

 

Leagues have names now, so instead of simply calling them Division 1, Division 2, Division 3, we call them by their real life names like Premiership, Serie A, 1. Bundesliga, SuperLiga and so on. Let us know if there is anything wrong with the names added.

Cheers!

 

January 13, 2008 07:22

4,310 posts(s)

Administator

 

I agree Philipp, contract clauses are on our plans, it will certainly make negotiations more interesting.

Cheers!