Recent Posts
18,562 posts(s) found
I cant hold anymore….please you have to get a new system to determin the game result….i’m tired of loose against weaker teams…..it not far….i can understand when i win against weaker teams and i get understand when i loose against stronger teams… but its not fair that i play better and have better players and loose….
you should do something about this…
best regards…diogo…
Hola Muchachos,
I think that a good example of this problem is in FastTicker-France-Ligue 1-Marseille they have lost ALL the games in the ligue and in the National Cup, the reason is because of the poor quality of the team specially the the low # of players and they also have NO keeper, they only have 12 players 6 of them are youth their keeper is a youth attaker with 30 rating in the keeper statistic.
There should be something done to the game regarding computer teams because as it is know, it takes off the competition out of it this example Marseille was the ligue 1 champion in season 2 and just 3 seasons after they can’t even keep a decent team. Also in the competition, it is incredible that a player can have 74 goals in just 28 games (Alex Hamel from Paris-SG) in just one game he scored 19 goals that is the ammount of a decent forward IN ONE SEASON I currently manage Caen and I have also scored 22 goals in just 2 matches (home and away, and one player André Lechat has 15 goals in the 2 matches) and I do not think that this makes it fais for everyone because it just takes out one team out of the competition. if you analyse the data on Top Scorers for every nation the average out of the 10 players listed is about 23 goals and in France the average is about 35 that is a great difference in statistics.
And talking about competitions, about the UEFA cup Marseille has a match against Hamburger SV. we know for sure who is going to win. its ok with me personally, the only problem that I see is that it is not fair for France as a nation since participation point in European Competitions are accounted for in Nation Rankings I think that this puts France (and other nations that have teams with this same problem) in a handicap.
I had a conversation with a fellow manager from France and we came to the conclution that France has done bad in international competitions bcause of this same reason, the computer teams do not give out as much competition as they should be and this brings the quality of the good teams down.
This is just my opinion sorry if its long but I tried to put everything in perspective…
You’re right nsg, friendly invitations and admins emails are sent in the sender’s language. What you see is Portuguese :-)
We have to fix that.
Cheers!
I sometimes get system emails in the wrong language. On several occasions I have had friendly requests or accepted friendly notifications come through in what looks to be Spanish or Portuguese, even though my language setting is English. Looks like a bug, perhaps related to the other team’s language setting rather than mine?
Also a couple of times I have had your administrator emails come through from user “administradores”.
cheers.
Yeah, it’s not very useful unless you generate two youth star keepers :-)
The odds for a new youth to be a keeper are low enough, something around 10%, not sure if it’s worth adding such a validation, we’d be also reducing the number of keepers in the game.
Cheers!
Hugo, we tried not to lose much time in the CPU teams “intelligence” and focus on human users features, that’s why we designed it this way. And in the average it’s not that bad, cause usually a team will have a balanced squad, not crap attackers and great defenders and midfielders. But we can change the logic to use at least 1 player per zone (D, M and A), maybe that would be a little bit more realistic :-)
Cheers!
Hi,
Shouln’t there be a “limit”/validation on the number of youth goalkeepers ?
I have currently two youth goalkeepers + the “professionals”, not very usefull!!
Please take in consideration the formation to be used as CPU will use players with the highest skill, generating formations like 5-5-0… If this can happen so 0-5-5 or 5-0-5 can…These formations shouldn’t be created!
Cheers!
I’m glad you mentioned it, I’ve added this limitation today, but the number is 14, considering only non-loaned and non-youth players that are part of your squad. The team must also have at least one goalkeeper. There are a few tweaks to enforce this in all situations, but it should work for all cases in practice.
Cheers!
I agree with that, 16 should be the minimum, make the bots sign the best available free players on the market or something like that. :)
Hi,
Can you take a look at the team Sport in brazil. It has only 6+6 players with two goalkeepers, one bought now for 5.200$. Shouldn’t there be a minimum players limit a team can have, the same way there is a maximum ?
I’ve just realized that the 3 tick rule is not enough to prevent some kinds of cheating, so unfortunately we’ll have to keep the same network/ip rule :-(
Cheers!
We had an error and it didn’t complete, now it is running again.
Cheers!
Hi
Can you please take a look at the medium tick … it’s still running afer more than 2.30h
Hi, while you decide what to do … can I at least be alowed to make an offer for a Sporting player ? :)
Thanks Gabriel,
I’m trying to report some wrong things that I’ve been noticed in my team. I’m trying hard to improve my team too, buyng expensive attackers, playing a lot of friendly to grow up some atributes and anything tha looks like strange I’ll report to be shure.
Thanks!
Regards
Stramazi
We’ll let you know if we find anything strange. Don’t get me wrong for explaining about the cards, I did that cause I know we are missing some help screens and making the game rules and behaviour clear is always good. :-)
Cheers!
I Know about it Gabriel.
But let it be.
Thanks
We’ll definitely check Stramazi. When you look at the cards icons in the players skills screen or in the formations screen keep in mind that they refer to your next match, so if your next match is a friendly for instance you won’t see any card icon. To check the cards for specific competitions go to your players screen and click in the Cards option.
Cheers!
Gabriel,
So the bugs is that this where not showned previously on that match. Becasue I always look in the Team Setup to prepare the players. And this happens twice since I report you this.
Thanks for explanation but please, check if this could be happening.
Regards,
Stramazi
After investigating your last match against Nautico I saw that Adao Branco and Germano Medeiros were suspended for that match, so Paolo Rosi and Fausto Ruiz Del Mora replaced them. Everything looks fine. Please let us know if you notice anything different.
Cheers!
This happen again against Nautico in the last league match. And with the same player. I’m preparing him to Sudamericana Cup, but if he continue playing without listed I’wont be able to start nothing in equality with others teams.
I’ve been wronged with this situation in league too.
Could someone help me?
Thanks.
Ok, sounds like a bug then :-(
Cheers!
No Gabriel,
There where no suspended player in that game. Not ijuried too.
That’s why I’m reporting you this possible bug.
Thanks
Stramazi
I’ll talk to Danilo about that JD, we may be able to remove that and trust the 3 tick rule.
Cheers!
The player value can decrease if he was bought for a price higher than his estimated value, that would be the most common case. Even if that’s not the case, the value could decrease a little when improving, as the new value is recalculated and is not 100% deterministic.
Cheers!
Is it possible you had a suspended player that was automatically replaced by Paolo Rosi?
Cheers!
Hi, does this mean that if anyone enters the game using the same network/computer that you use, it’s automaticaly excluded from negotiations with that team ? For how long ?
I’m trying to buy a player from “Portugal > SuperLiga > Sporting > Players” and cannot due to this message…
Doesn’t the “3 ticks rule” prevents “in house” negotiations ?
we will investigate and get back to you.
cheers!
we will investigate and get back to you.
cheers!