but what if the loan termination request was not granted???
@onions, nowadays players don’t get +3 while playing at home, but the away team players get -3 penalty on all the skills.
a new update was recently issued so that players who are 31 or above do not receive -3 penalty on their skills. ie, they will be as good as when they play at home. this was issued to make elder players more valuable and their experience count.
Who will get the punishment?? the manager who hired or the manager who let him go…
Hypothetical situation:
Manager A hires player P who has been allowed to miss 6 matches. Suppose he misses the first 5 matches during manager A’s regime, and then the manager gets fired or leaves the team. Lets say CPU takes over some time and during that period he misses 1 more match. After that lets say a new manager B comes in and finds that loaned player was not good enough for the team. so, he doesn’t select him for the match but requests a loan termination to which the other team does not respond. (due to any reasons, financial or not being online at the moment or any other)
Now subsequently the player returns back after missing more than 6 matches.
Now, i am just curious as to how the punishment is divided over managers A, CPU and B. and what happens in case the loan termination request is not responded…??
EDIT: these kind of problems will occur in future, so, it is better to develop a consensus on how to tackle them before they arise…
@ulisses, goalkeeper was not just good, he was also the man of the match:)… but i have to agree i got away with that… both of my first choice strikers were red-carded :s (+remember u were playing away)
the one that scored the second was a 19 year old 86 shooter… well done my young talent;)
EDIT: i never complain when i lose, because, we know these guys are working on match engine and will take some time to fix, but then the last two results showed me, that match engine is not that much random either… i always knew a GK was my weakest link, so, i always found myself at fault for not being able to get a decent keeper…
But now with a good keeper at helm for the last two matches, i can effectively say, good balanced team can improve your performance even under current situation. But then that doesn’t mean ME is perferct…
10m would have been good for him
you should not remind him filipe;) waiting 2 more hours:)
Price for Jose-Manuel Tomé is $7,854,995 (negotiable, just quote in your price)
The following very good goalkeepers are available on loan:
try them out…
Jose-Manuel Tomé (Available for sale too. still improving…)
Attributes
Position: G
Side: -
Keeping: 89
Tackle: 31
Passing: 83
Shooting: 28
Speed: 93
Dribble: 87
Control: 97
Header: 100
Aggressiveness: 65
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/65582
Orestes Paiva
Attributes
Position: G
Side: -
Keeping: 93
Tackle: 24
Passing: 81
Shooting: 25
Speed: 88
Dribble: 100
Control: 94
Header: 86
Aggressiveness: 56
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/78069
Assists in the match report too
Loan Embargo
Does the punishment ever reset again?? may be after one season or after the manager has switched the teams…
just want to make things clear…
that basically means they need some match warm-up :)
ok.. just wanted things to be clear…
and one more thing, what does “recovery after running” means???
“Beware of your players stamina! Next season the rules will be more strict affecting the overall skills of the players instead of only their recovery after running. Every 3 points below 100 stamina will reduce all skills by 1%.”
- Nice one…
just to make it more precise, is the following data correct?
(100-3)=97 = -1%
(100-4)=96 = -2%
(100-5)=95 = -3%
.
.
.
(100-96)=4 = -93%
(100-97)=3 = -94%
(*more chances of mistake in calculation by a manager, especially in his first season)
how about making it the follows??
(100-1)=99 = -1%
(100-2)=98 = -2%
(100-3)=97 = -3%
.
.
.
(100-96)=4 = -96%
(100-97)=3 = -97%
This one is more easy for managers to understand and thus they will make less mistakes in calculations especially if you are new manager…
Jose-Manuel Tomé (he is still improving, but on the wrong skills, hopefully changing teams will help improve the right one. Overall average is approx 92)
Age: 27
Nationality: Spain
Estimated Value: $13,078,258 *
Transfer Value : *$12,254,995 (negotiable, quote your price)
Position: G
Side: -
Keeping: 89
Tackle: 31
Passing: 83
Shooting: 28
Speed: 93
Dribble: 87
Control: 97
Header: 100
Aggressiveness: 65
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/65582
yah… i sold most of my players too… i don’t know if anyone checks the transfers thread
i don’t agree with the 27-28 upgrade either…
kuroyuki, this has been introduced in RS to make the older players more valuable, even when they start losing skills…
we understand your point, but as we lower the age a little too much, the older players again will be relatively useless…
EDIT : danilo, i was talking about changing the formation in the “Matches” screen. there is a save button, i was saying i might have forgotten to save after selecting the formation…
sorry gab… for my “little” and “small” rant
well, since i lost the first away match i didn’t use the away formation this time around, i used my default “Parag” formation instead… or did i forget to save after changing the formation
Funny as it is, even those substitutions, which i had already deleted were made:)
thank god i won the game and went through…
after turn 48, i changed my the players in my default formation for the cup match in turn 49, but i can see the players playing in the cup are those that were in my default formation for turn 48….
i haven’t made any changes to the formation after this cup match… but then the players are exactly the same that were selected for earlier turn…
i know it is not due to the card issue… because i remember my goalkeeper didnt’ have any card for the cup match and still he was replaced with another one.
one or two players might have got the card… but how come all those players who had higher stamina levels (selected for the match) not play in the game
3 defenders, one goalkeeper, and two midfielders…
gabriel,,, i won’t alter my formation… if you need my user id and password, pls let me know
Players with more than 30 years old did not receive the -3 penalty on all skills when their team is playing as a visitor. This change was made to represent the experience acquired by older players.
This should provide as an incentive to keep aged players…
u will be missed… u made the french league interesting…
there are possibilities… but then i can assure you i will not be fired for bankruptcy:) not at least in the near future … but then it is a possibility…
but i don’t regret that… i am lucky that i got an improving player :)
and remember had i got him from the transfer market, i would have had to pay around 40 millions for a player of similar calibre… so, if you look for the longer term, strategically speaking, increased merchandising revenue and lack of transfer fees will more than compensate for high wages…
Federico Izaga
Age: 21
Nationality: Spain
Estimated Value: $1,099,093
Transfer Value : $5,000,000
Attributes
Position: D
Side: L
Keeping: 33
Tackle: 84
Passing: 68
Shooting: 74
Speed: 82
Dribble: 85
Control: 67
Header: 86
Aggressiveness: 15
Decision to let him go is purely an economical one… Wage bill of 650K approx is taking its toll:(
simon, i advise u to spell your team name correctly though:);)
i have stopped suggesting on this matter because not a single thing has been done in this since last 8 months… most of these suggestions have already been made by someone or other… hopefully match engine might change that…
you are doing very good recently… but don’t forget it is going to be a long season and one injury or a red card can decide a lot of things.
all the best to you :)