Recent Posts by Nirabdha

Subscribe to Recent Posts by Nirabdha 651 posts(s) found

October 28, 2009 11:07

651 posts(s)

 

but what if the loan termination request was not granted???

 

October 28, 2009 07:08

651 posts(s)

 

@onions, nowadays players don’t get +3 while playing at home, but the away team players get -3 penalty on all the skills.

a new update was recently issued so that players who are 31 or above do not receive -3 penalty on their skills. ie, they will be as good as when they play at home. this was issued to make elder players more valuable and their experience count.

 

October 28, 2009 03:20

651 posts(s)

 

Who will get the punishment?? the manager who hired or the manager who let him go…
Hypothetical situation:
Manager A hires player P who has been allowed to miss 6 matches. Suppose he misses the first 5 matches during manager A’s regime, and then the manager gets fired or leaves the team. Lets say CPU takes over some time and during that period he misses 1 more match. After that lets say a new manager B comes in and finds that loaned player was not good enough for the team. so, he doesn’t select him for the match but requests a loan termination to which the other team does not respond. (due to any reasons, financial or not being online at the moment or any other)

Now subsequently the player returns back after missing more than 6 matches.

Now, i am just curious as to how the punishment is divided over managers A, CPU and B. and what happens in case the loan termination request is not responded…??

EDIT: these kind of problems will occur in future, so, it is better to develop a consensus on how to tackle them before they arise…

 

October 28, 2009 02:45

651 posts(s)

 

@ulisses, goalkeeper was not just good, he was also the man of the match:)… but i have to agree i got away with that… both of my first choice strikers were red-carded :s (+remember u were playing away)
the one that scored the second was a 19 year old 86 shooter… well done my young talent;)

EDIT: i never complain when i lose, because, we know these guys are working on match engine and will take some time to fix, but then the last two results showed me, that match engine is not that much random either… i always knew a GK was my weakest link, so, i always found myself at fault for not being able to get a decent keeper…
But now with a good keeper at helm for the last two matches, i can effectively say, good balanced team can improve your performance even under current situation. But then that doesn’t mean ME is perferct…

 

October 27, 2009 17:54

651 posts(s)

 

10m would have been good for him

 

October 27, 2009 13:52

651 posts(s)

 

you should not remind him filipe;) waiting 2 more hours:)

 

October 27, 2009 12:38

651 posts(s)

 

Price for Jose-Manuel Tomé is $7,854,995 (negotiable, just quote in your price)

 

October 27, 2009 05:05

651 posts(s)

 

The following very good goalkeepers are available on loan:
try them out…
Jose-Manuel Tomé (Available for sale too. still improving…)
Attributes
Position: G
Side: -
Keeping: 89
Tackle: 31
Passing: 83
Shooting: 28
Speed: 93
Dribble: 87
Control: 97
Header: 100
Aggressiveness: 65
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/65582

Orestes Paiva

Attributes
Position: G
Side: -
Keeping: 93
Tackle: 24
Passing: 81
Shooting: 25
Speed: 88
Dribble: 100
Control: 94
Header: 86
Aggressiveness: 56

http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/78069

 

October 27, 2009 02:56

651 posts(s)

 

Assists in the match report too

 

October 26, 2009 06:02

651 posts(s)

 

Loan Embargo
Does the punishment ever reset again?? may be after one season or after the manager has switched the teams…

just want to make things clear…

 

October 26, 2009 01:44

651 posts(s)

 

that basically means they need some match warm-up :)

 

October 25, 2009 16:38

651 posts(s)

 

ok.. just wanted things to be clear…
and one more thing, what does “recovery after running” means???

 

October 25, 2009 13:40

651 posts(s)

 

Beware of your players stamina! Next season the rules will be more strict affecting the overall skills of the players instead of only their recovery after running. Every 3 points below 100 stamina will reduce all skills by 1%.
- Nice one…
just to make it more precise, is the following data correct?

(100-3)=97 = -1%
(100-4)=96 = -2%
(100-5)=95 = -3%
.
.
.
(100-96)=4 = -93%
(100-97)=3 = -94%
(*more chances of mistake in calculation by a manager, especially in his first season)

how about making it the follows??
(100-1)=99 = -1%
(100-2)=98 = -2%
(100-3)=97 = -3%
.
.
.
(100-96)=4 = -96%
(100-97)=3 = -97%

This one is more easy for managers to understand and thus they will make less mistakes in calculations especially if you are new manager…

 

October 25, 2009 03:02

651 posts(s)

 

Jose-Manuel Tomé (he is still improving, but on the wrong skills, hopefully changing teams will help improve the right one. Overall average is approx 92)
Age: 27
Nationality: Spain

Estimated Value: $13,078,258 *
Transfer Value : *$12,254,995
(negotiable, quote your price)

Position: G
Side: -
Keeping: 89
Tackle: 31
Passing: 83
Shooting: 28
Speed: 93
Dribble: 87
Control: 97
Header: 100

Aggressiveness: 65

http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/65582

 

October 22, 2009 15:58

651 posts(s)

 

yah… i sold most of my players too… i don’t know if anyone checks the transfers thread

 

October 22, 2009 08:39

651 posts(s)

 

i don’t agree with the 27-28 upgrade either…

 

October 22, 2009 04:19

651 posts(s)

 

kuroyuki, this has been introduced in RS to make the older players more valuable, even when they start losing skills…

we understand your point, but as we lower the age a little too much, the older players again will be relatively useless…

 

October 21, 2009 02:02

651 posts(s)

 

EDIT : danilo, i was talking about changing the formation in the “Matches” screen. there is a save button, i was saying i might have forgotten to save after selecting the formation…

 

October 21, 2009 01:37

651 posts(s)

 

sorry gab… for my “little” and “small” rant

 

October 21, 2009 01:32

651 posts(s)

 

well, since i lost the first away match i didn’t use the away formation this time around, i used my default “Parag” formation instead… or did i forget to save after changing the formation

 

October 20, 2009 16:41

651 posts(s)

 

Funny as it is, even those substitutions, which i had already deleted were made:)

thank god i won the game and went through…

 

October 20, 2009 16:19

651 posts(s)

 

after turn 48, i changed my the players in my default formation for the cup match in turn 49, but i can see the players playing in the cup are those that were in my default formation for turn 48….
i haven’t made any changes to the formation after this cup match… but then the players are exactly the same that were selected for earlier turn…

i know it is not due to the card issue… because i remember my goalkeeper didnt’ have any card for the cup match and still he was replaced with another one.

one or two players might have got the card… but how come all those players who had higher stamina levels (selected for the match) not play in the game
3 defenders, one goalkeeper, and two midfielders…

gabriel,,, i won’t alter my formation… if you need my user id and password, pls let me know

 

October 20, 2009 06:53

651 posts(s)

 

Players with more than 30 years old did not receive the -3 penalty on all skills when their team is playing as a visitor. This change was made to represent the experience acquired by older players.

This should provide as an incentive to keep aged players…

 

October 20, 2009 04:35

651 posts(s)

 

u will be missed… u made the french league interesting…

 

October 19, 2009 13:46

651 posts(s)

 

there are possibilities… but then i can assure you i will not be fired for bankruptcy:) not at least in the near future … but then it is a possibility…

 

October 19, 2009 08:55

651 posts(s)

 

but i don’t regret that… i am lucky that i got an improving player :)
and remember had i got him from the transfer market, i would have had to pay around 40 millions for a player of similar calibre… so, if you look for the longer term, strategically speaking, increased merchandising revenue and lack of transfer fees will more than compensate for high wages…

 

October 19, 2009 06:27

651 posts(s)

 

Federico Izaga

Age: 21
Nationality: Spain
Estimated Value: $1,099,093
Transfer Value : $5,000,000
Attributes
Position: D
Side: L
Keeping: 33
Tackle: 84
Passing: 68
Shooting: 74
Speed: 82
Dribble: 85
Control: 67
Header: 86

Aggressiveness: 15

Decision to let him go is purely an economical one… Wage bill of 650K approx is taking its toll:(

 

October 18, 2009 15:17

651 posts(s)

 

simon, i advise u to spell your team name correctly though:);)

 

October 18, 2009 04:28

651 posts(s)

 

i have stopped suggesting on this matter because not a single thing has been done in this since last 8 months… most of these suggestions have already been made by someone or other… hopefully match engine might change that…

 

October 18, 2009 04:20

651 posts(s)

 

you are doing very good recently… but don’t forget it is going to be a long season and one injury or a red card can decide a lot of things.

all the best to you :)