Recent Posts
18,555 posts(s) found
how about adding this thing to the newspaper section…
torte,
go there Aggressiveness
it has been discussed there
Rather than financial punishments, ( its not good to punish a team for managers behaviour ), its good to have some form of “blacklisting” manager. May be we could have something similar to disciplinary points that we have for player. or May be if he shows that kind of behaviour for more than 5 times, then, we could black list him in the transfer market. That means other managers would think twice before negotiating with him.
But as i said ahead, since it is always the team that has to pay the financial punishment, its not good to assign financial punishment. What happens if a manager removes that player from the transfer list, and becomes “eligible” for the punishment, but leaves the team after that, because he got a better job.
What impact does aggression have on your team if any, i never really understood this even in MS, does it make them more liable to bookings or what.
Thanks
Chris
I agree with sylvain, you should be able to recall or send back a player with no penalties, i also think you should definately consider an option so the manager can decide where his player goes, that way there shouldn’t be a need to cancel the contracts as you are sending him somewhere that you feel he will probably play.
Interesting idea, Rodrigo. This way we would probably reduce the number of managers who transfer list a player with no real intent of selling him or raising the price as soon as he/she realizes that lots of teams are interested in buying the player.
I’d like to read more opinions.
If I got it right you want to be able to recall or return a loaned player for free, right Sly? Well, personally I think that’s ok. When I first introduced the fine to recall or return a loaned player the idea was to be fair with the other team, but now I see it brought more worries than benefits. Maybe we should try that and see how it goes :)
If there’s something that’s really annoying is when a manager puts a player on transfer and, after we offer the value he’s asking, the manager raises the price or simply remove the player of the transfer list.
Besides the fact that it’s irritating and unethical, sometimes it’s a problem, too, because we stop looking for another player or give up on another transaction because we found the “right guy”.
I think we shouldn’t forbid it, but the manager should receive a very expensive punishment, maybe 10% of the price that the manager was asking (when he cancels the transfers) or 10% or 20% of the diference between the old and the new prices. The punishment would be apllied, of course, only if someone offers the previous asked price.
What do you think about it, guys?
I personally think you should do it like it was in managersim. I think both sides should be able to cancel or recall a loan. It’s your player. If he’s not playing then there are plenty of teams that could use the player and will play him.
I really don’t see the problem. At the moment it just sucks if you are happy you loaned out a player but he’s not being played and there is NOTHING you can do about it. I think this is a big downside and I think it should be changed.
Fixed!
If you have two players with same name on match replays both will be displayed.
Fixed!
Next time we’ll have first place in group 1 playing against second place in group 4, first place in group 2 playing against second place in group 3 and so on. Semi-finals won’t be predefined, they will behave the way it was before (best against worse). For South American competitions where we only have 2 groups it will be first in one group against second in the other.
AZ sounds good Hopjes. I got the names from a website but if you guys have any suggestions for more commonly used names just let us know ;)
First of all I assure you there is no bias towards teams without managers :)
Two things to consider. Lorient played at home, so you should add 3 points to each skill you mentioned. Also, the secondary skills may give him an advantage. Their striker for example has good dribbling skills which may explain how he managed to reach the goal and score twice.
Anyway, there are some factors to consider or maybe Lorient just got lucky. What I can tell you is there is no bias ;)
I won’t bite for any team, I’m like a sticker…
Further I like to suggest “AZ” instead of “Alkmaar” or do you only know AZ by its city where it’s from ?
i had a game with Lorient. Let me describe our basic comparisons briefly. (comparisons are on primary skill)
Its best keeper had a rating of 80, mine had 89.
Its best defender had a rating of 88, mine had 92.
Its best midfielder had a rating of 81, whereas i fielded guys having 83,84,85,86 respectively. (later i substituted one with 85 rating by one of my youngsters who had 80 rating).
it had three strikers with 74, 82 and 83 rating whereas both of mine had 84. (although, thats not a huge difference).
its formation was 3-4-3, whereas mine was 4-4-2.
given the difference in formation it is normal that the team with more strikers gets more shots in.
he had 12 shots on target and i had 9 of them on target.
now, 5 of my players had 10 rating in the match, and only one of his player had 10 rating. Better players skills, better player rating in the match, but still i lost the match…
what is that part of the game that i have been missing or finding difficult to grasp… pls let me know
parag
Please dont allow it to be abused
if you do recall a player then a break in contract should take effect
if a player is loaned out and payed for than is it not the managers perogitive on what he does with him
he is footing the bill, it cant be all one way in your favour, especially since you are reducing your risk and xpecting another club to develop.
Maybe a posible bonus point system for players loaned out : incentive!
I agree Alexander, we’ll figure out a good way to reintroduce this option.
The option to recall a player from a loan needs to be reintroduced asap in my opinion. It is very sad to see a young prospect loaned out only to be placed on the bench with out any match experience. Introduce all the control and regulation needed, but bring back the possibility to recall the player.
thanks
That meens he’s negociating for a new contract. He’s not buying his own player :)
look at this player in the game as it shows the selling club bidding on the player?????
FastTicker – Season 20, Turn 17 / 144
Countries > Brazil > Série B > Ituano > Players Jean-François RicaudPlayer Info – Player Stats – Player History
General Info
Age: 20
Nationality:
Club: Ituano
Previous club: Lyon
Estimated Value: $6,279,577
3-Turn Wage: $1,691
Contract Begin: Season 17, Turn 41
Contract End: Season 20, Turn 41
Buy player ($16,350,725)
transfer price: $16,350,725
Current Negotiations
Ituano
Attributes
Position: M
Side: RC
Keeping: 40
Tackle: 71
Passing: 82
Shooting: 73
Speed: 85
Dribble: 84
Control: 87
Header: 82
Aggressiveness: 56
Stamina: 84
Two excellent players for sale. Both won the Champions league 3 times.
- GOALIE ###
Gilberto Caballero
Age: 24
Position: G
Keeping: 98 <<<<
Speed: 78 <<
Dribble: 87 <<<<
Control: 97 <<<<
Header: 80 <<
- ATTACK ###
Cesar Rey Casquete
– 262 goals in 211 official matches !
– Age: 25
Position: A
Side: LR
Tackle: 90 <<<<
Passing: 76 <<
Shooting: 90 <<<<
Speed: 84 <<
Dribble: 100 <<<<<<
Control: 90 <<<<
Header: 80 <<
Drop in your offers, in both cases prices are (a bit) negotiable … Hertha BSC Berlin
That I understand, but without the need to trumpet my current financial situation, this shouldn’t be a problem. But the situation has resolved itself and I’m allowed to expand with maximum number of seats again. Perhaps it was a browser bug or something – who knows.
Thx for reply anyway.
The board doesn’t allow you to expand your stadium if your financial situation is not going to be regular after the expansion.
Hi
I cannot expand the stadium by more than 700 seats. Previously this hasn’t been a problem. Is this a bug or has anything been changed recently in this department?
Kind regards
Alexander
Hahahaha! C’mon man, take a look at my squad, it’s awesome! Rock solid defense, offensive midfielders all over around and José Andrade, a striker which I have no words to describe. I just need to find the perfect tactics ;)
It was born the smallest, staying the smallest depend on you guys ;)
The stadium size was generated based on player wages, that’s why they’re so small. At least increasing the size of small stadiums is not that expensive.
I saw RBC roosendaal with 17.000 stadium aswell :). This is a 1st division team in real life with about 5000 spots :)
BTW, Gabriel’s team always gives me trouble… I think he cheats! (KIDDING!!!)