Recent Posts
18,570 posts(s) found
My guess:
A0LC Kirkup | A0RC Vilela
A-1LC Lemoine
M+1C Palazzoni
M0RC Nunes
M-1C Bandeira
D+1C Scozzari
D0LC Guillo |D0C Cabral | D0RC Varela
And rotate players to save stamina
This player: http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/69297
is been loaned for 144 turns. It is the best mid in his team and don´t have huge wage.
I will test. Thank you.
LOLL my drawing din’t work so.. I ll try to explain
3 def DC 2 M -1 1 M L (0) and M R (0) and 1 M(+1) and 2 A (0)
try 3-5-2! O u have a team for that kind of tactic!
O O
O
O O(MA)
O O
O
O
Dimensions don’t get locked during the whole tick anymore, only during critical updates like contract negotiatons and job applications processing. It means you can still navigate in a dimension while most updates are being done. You should be aware that some changes might not be applied until the next update. For example, if you changed your formation during the update and your match that turn had already been processed your formation changes won’t be used until your next match.
already played in 433 in the 451 and 442 could not get any good results, until the beginning of the 433 I got a string of three victories, only that there came four draws unspeakable. I played attack on RC, C, LC and half with an advance in the C +1 and others in the LC 0 and RC 0 and the defense in line behind an advanced on C +1, medium passes, kicks and play mixed medium.
What sort of formation and tactics are you using? How is your formation structured? I know I had to do alot of fiddling before I finally got my team playing the way I wanted.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/661
Do not know what you have on this team, change tactics, change position and the team does not yield, ties, ties, ties even with teams of very inferior quality, which will have some pest here? I do not know what else to do.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/661
1 × 0
4-3-3 formação 4-3-3
44% posse de bola 56%
10 chutes 20
9 chutes a gol 18
92% passes certos 90%
64% roubadas efetivas 79%
0 escanteios 5
14 impedimentos 5
7 faltas 3
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/791514
Both players always play as substitutes, just 35 minutes. Maybe that’s why their ratings are relatively bad. Anyway, I wouldn’t care about ratings when I buy players …
3 players for sale:
top-end defender, 100 tackle – http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/78078
solid midfielder, 88 pass, excellent secondary skills – http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/76293
effective lower defender – http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/89486
Also, 4 young players for loan, I pay most or all of the wages as long as they’re starting for a team somewhere with a decent coaching staff:
21 yr old D, 82 tackle – http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/113558
18 year old M, 83 pass – http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/126788
18 year old A, 80 shooting – http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/129651
20 year old MD 74-77 – http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/119969
I’m surprised you got someone to go almost 15 on Iturralde – looking at his stats, he’s never played well, despite his ratings. Similar case for Wagner. In a vacuum, with their ratings, those would be decent prices, but anytime I see someone with high ratings and terrible stats, I’m always a bit concerned.
Yeah, a definite no to owning 2 teams. I’d agree with Joseppi that I’d just prefer it if the CPU took more loaned players. Lots of these guys would be huge improvements over what they have, and with many of them requiring little to no salary, it’d make sense.
Yeah, that top player thing should only apply to the top 3-5 players as determined by the board.
I did, but when you have lots of good players even those that are not among your best are great. That was the case. I’ve already returned the player to the team since the guy fired the player and left, which does not make any sense.
Why not just get CPU teams to loan players more frequently? A manager should only be allowed one team per game world. Also alot of smaller teams would loan players if money was involved, like a cash agreement of 1,000,000 etc over the full season..
Still there is alot of other things that need worked on before they get anywere near this part of the game.
the guy from tenerife put a great player( Angulo) on free! Gabriel I though that u made an ubgrade that the best players can’t be put on free ??!!
ok, it is not a big sale anymore. But two very good players are for sale …
a 92 tackler http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/101560
and a 93 passer http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/99814
again!!!
2 × 2
4-4-2 formation 3-3-4
64% possession 36%
43 shots 8
40 shots on target 6
90% accurrate passes 95%
87% effective tackles 27%
10 corners 1
3 offsides 9
2 fouls 7
The team who bought probably has a good amount of money to spend and if you compare him with the other attackers in the squad it wasn’t a bad acquisition after all, specially considering his age, which is 18. I know what you’re saying, cpu managed teams are not that smart on their buyings, but believe me, they were worse before :)
can anyone explain why some wreck players are being sold for “huge” prices? check this example:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/128019
and i could give you some more
2 × 1
3-4-3 formação 4-3-3
44% posse de bola 56%
9 chutes 24
9 chutes a gol 21
85% passes certos 91%
49% roubadas efetivas 50%
2 escanteios 4
5 impedimentos 2
4 faltas 7
For SALE
Carmine Valcarenghi
Nationally: Italia
Club: Inter
Estimed Value: 2,231,299
Age: 30
Position: AM
Side: C
Shooting: 81
Speed: 87
Dribble: 81
Control: 91
Header: 85
Transfer Price: 15,000,000
Negotiable change price.
For SALE
Alessandro Rais
Nationally: Italia
Club: Inter
Estimed Value: 13,101,,875
Age: 31
Position: M
Side: RC
Passing: 97
Speed: 100
Dribble: 84
Control: 87
Header: 90
Transfer Price: 20,000,000
Negotiable change price.
player for sale
Angelo Deoma
Nationally: Italia
Club: Inter
Estimed Value: 13,348,329
Age: 30
Position: D
Side: C
Tackle: 100
Speed: 95
Dribble: 86
Control: 90
Header: 90
Transfer Price: 25,000,000
Negotiable change price.
We are not looking at this right now. I’ve tried to change it a while back but it turned out more complicated than I initially thought, so I postponed, but we will certainly go back to this problem.
Interesting suggestion, we can certainly foster the discussion around this idea.
Currently there is no relation between fitness and improvement.
Cheers.