Recent Posts by Sly
535 posts(s) found
Gabriel, you said DA can play attack or defence without penalties? But you meen you have to switch around from AD to DA to avoid a penalty right? Otherwise I’ve been switching it around for nothing. So again….Can I play DA in attack without him getting a penalty, or do I have to switch him to AD in order for him to play in attack and not get -3 penalty on all stats?
I agree with Philipp, tell me about these 300 mill tranfsers. I see players listed for that price, but I think only 2-4 clubs in the entire game can afford those prices. Not all managers are as skilled as others. I notice lots of over prices players, mainly because the manager has no real clue about the true value of a player. They will never sell them for those crazy prizes anyway….eventually they will either keep the player or lower the price so……
LOL Alban…..I’m sure that’s not his question. Blakos, all I know is that it really matters for defenders. If you have defenders on D+1 it is very important your goalkeeper has good dribble. The rest is all up to you….
I personally think the UEFA cup victory in season 19 of Lyon was more impressive :)….look at the type of players at Lyon and then look at Recreativo :)….proving you don’t need the best players to win :)
Could we get some respect here for our small French country here :). We have moved up from last spot to 4th in country ranking because of past succes and we did it with no money or hardly any 90+ stat players :).
conclusion: keep everything as it is now :)…things will start smoothing out :). Tbh, I don’t get the “no growth complaints”. I have tons of players who suddenly turned into starts :)….the new system only did me well! I now have players who are worth 40-50 mill. Before the system I was happy I had 2 players who were 10+ million.
Don’t you know? In CL…..anything can happen :). How I can lose vs CPU teams in the league and beat the reigning CL champion 4-1 I don’t know! It’s football!!! YOU NEVER KNOW!
Yeah right, like your the only one who has it hard :)
My opponents have a 100 goaly, 100 goaly and 99 goaly :)…how the hell should my 83 and 93 shooter get past that! :)
Are there any updates? I’m still in the same situation. I loaned a player who isn’t playing. So please, could you try and come up with some possible way to recall the player. He’s losing valuable playing time. I was actually subbing him myself and then noticed on 1 day I loaned him out. I was happy to see this at first, but now I’m regretting it since he’s NOT PLAYING!!
well I dón’t think 5 vs 4 is a very convincing yes. I would like to see double this in order for you to push it through. I’M REALLY REALLY NOT LIKING THIS IDEA!!!!!!!!. You are making it harder for smaller teams this way because of the reasons stated above. FOR GODSAKE PLEASE THINK THIS THROUGH!!! Please keeps things as they are now, since I think people are just to darn inpatient…..that’s why they now want to change things. It’s only been 2 seasons since the change and you already want to change it again? Common…just wait it out for another 3-5 seasons ATLEAST!!
Gabriel, thorpedo votes NO not yes, since if you are level 10 like him you have a player at his maximum @ 23….. so in his case he meens NO since players currently won’t reach there maximum at 27, otherwise he would vote yes…
so that makes it 4-4 in votes if you ask me….
read above… Hopjes votes NO aswell :)
Let’s have a vote, since I really don’t like the age idea. I’m ok with the acadamy thing, but after that it should be fair game. I think it’s nice to see a 21-23 year old player increase. It gives more chances to smaller teams to get decent players. This has 1 simple reason. If you know a player will increase more or is more likely to increase from 17-20, those players will never be sold or found anywhere. And if they are sold it’s unlikely they will be cheap and affordable for the smaller teams. In the current way it’s possible a superstar is being missed because he’s 22 but never really played any real matches. Managers could mistake his age for a player that is “done” increasing. This gives way to a smaller team to pick up this player for a decent price and later find out he got a superstar in the rough. PLEASE RECONSIDER THIS CHANGE! I truly think it’s a bad idea and will give a negatice spinoff for smaller teams!
well that’s good! That was the point of the entire youth system change! There are to many superstars right? Well…. let things go as they go now and this will deffinately happen. Problems solved…..
Sorry Parag, I’m not agreeing with you. You say “improving players is much more fun”. Well that’s your opinion :). I think both things can be enjoyable. It’s nice to see a young talents grow, but it’s also nice to find just that right player for just that right price who some how got missed by all these other big teams. Also you say “otherwise I don’t see how litte lower ranked teams can improve”. Please…..I won the league in my 3rd season with a team that just got promoted. I made it to the semi finals in the UEFA cup and the year after I held my own in CL vs some of the big teams out there like Benfica and Getafe. Last season even Lyon WON THE UEFA CUP!. This shows you don’t need the best players to do well. Those tactics are there for a reason Parag. I say keep things as they are now. Don’t forget when it comes to talent there is a fair amount of luck involved. You will never really know if a player will get very good or not.
I don’t agree…. it will create a lame spinoff effect that it will be harder and harder to sell people above 20 year old players. I think it’s nice to see 21 or 22 year olds suddenly increase greatly. I’m not likeing this idea at all….
I don’t think you can. Logical right…if you are a team in real life and you don’t win, why would sponsers be intrested in sponsering you. The sponsers want to be ascociated with a winning team, not a losing team :)
Is it just me, or is the site really slow today? I’m getting really long and annoying load times. Do other people have this aswell or is it just me?
well, how long before this can be implemented, because I want my player to either start playing matches or return to my club. It’s getting pretty annoying. Also because the manager who loans him doesn’t answer to my e-mails….
I don’t see why you would think recalling a loan for free could be abused? How the hell could you abuse it? I currently have a player loaned out who’s not playing. Now this really annoys me because I’m sure I could loan him to another team who would be very happy to have him. Because of this the players loses an entire season of increasements, so it will only take longer for him to get better. Now… please tell me…what the points is of not being able to recall a player? It really is starting to piss me off, and perhaps even more managers. Then in the future….why the hell loan out a player. If he’s not being played you are screwed. You are better of just keeping them yourself….
Well happy to see you are coming around. That penalty thing was a bad idea. If there is no penalty there is no way of “cheating” the system. It’s your player. If he’s not playing and you want him to play then I think you should be able to recall him. If the loaning manager doesn’t like that……well…thats his fault right? Then he should have played him….why loan a player in the 1st place then! On the otherside, if you loaned a player and feel like you really don’t need him anymore you should be able to send him back. I doubt the manager who owns the player would mind, since he could most likely loan him out again anyway. Both sides happy……boths sides win. PROBLEM SOLVED!
I personally think you should do it like it was in managersim. I think both sides should be able to cancel or recall a loan. It’s your player. If he’s not playing then there are plenty of teams that could use the player and will play him.
I really don’t see the problem. At the moment it just sucks if you are happy you loaned out a player but he’s not being played and there is NOTHING you can do about it. I think this is a big downside and I think it should be changed.
That meens he’s negociating for a new contract. He’s not buying his own player :)
I saw RBC roosendaal with 17.000 stadium aswell :). This is a 1st division team in real life with about 5000 spots :)
I have the most expensive player possible :)
Neil Brimming from Brest in FT → $2,147,483,647
Was this idea dropped already? I still this idea tbh, but nobody has commented on it yet.
you sure about that? :)…. could you atleast try? :)
drugs cost money :)…..seeing I don’t have money I’ll just keep playing this darn game way to much :)
I would like to see something added here. When you have to qualify for CL and you lose you are done with international games. I think you should make it realistic and let the team procede in UEFA. Otherwise… I might change my mind into getting that CL spot, when I rather would have UEFA groups. It gets me more experiance for my youths and more money….
I would like to see this added next season. I think it kinda sucks to get knocked out of CL qualify and then be totally done.
1 thing is for sure. It’s better then managersim. That holiday mode totally messed up your team……here atleast they have some calculations to help the cpu lineup the best players…