Recent Posts by Philipp Leibeck
375 posts(s) found
Mail check boxes: for my taste the boxes are now a bit too small (activation area) – it’s harder to activate them
now we have logos, nice. but how about some more graphics for the team info page …
what do you think about a trophy cabinet/showcase:
– golden star for each national league title (1/2 star for 2nd place)
– Cup-image for every national cup won (small cup for finalists)
– same for CL, Libertadores,Copa Sudamericana and UEFA
same for the managers info page … – icons maybe added by the national flag for the trophys
Gabriel, don’t get your example – to be honest …
But i would like to be considered: Whenever i call back a loaned player to my team, there was a reason. The main reason is that the the manager who loaned the player didn’t stick with what he commited: The (youth) player gets match-practise in almost every game. So why should i pay a punishment (fee) for the dishonorable party when i protect (the development of) my player ?! i don’t wanna support managers without sportmenship and fairplay.
it should be differentiate between calling back a playing and selling a player (during a loan) – for the last instance i would agree with a “fee”
TEams from pre-qualification round in Cl shouldn’t play each other in the 2nd round (of 16).
is the star status on your agenda already? like in ssim … silvers, gold, or smth else.
Important for merchandising, team attractivity for purchases, etc.
all at once, plus filters
anyway, are there plans to get info after an turn (tick) what someone has to offer a player to be the highest bidder? – Just considering bids made in the last, completed turns, not the current ?
alright gabriel, i can live with a lack of luck ;-)
for transfer listed and free TLed player the logic is as followed, right?
You offer a wage and after 3 turns you get the player or not with your entered wage amount. Meanwhile you get no response if there was or is already a better/higher wage offered for the player.
But why is it, that an a.i./cpu team has obviously the advantage of knowing the other, already put in, offers? In my case: i offered a player 13.250. Later on in the last turn another new a.i. team made an approach and got the player, his bid: 13.266 …
the match dates for the post-qualification rounnd are already fixed, right? Why don’t you integrate them already in the schedule (with opponent “not defined yet” till qualif is done)… So the directly qualified team manager could already define the formation for the matches. otherwise it’s just too short between annoucement of CL matches and the matches itself – worst case: default is used.
friendly statistics: yes, please!
Alright, Gabriel. Thanks for explaining.
cheers
it’s not that sytem picks the best player available, but that the system doesn’t replace the missing player at his original position … what if a goalie is banned? do the system steps up with a 3-5-3 …?!
why is it that if one player of the standard formation is banned for a match by (red) cards the computer doesnt replace a sustitute in the same spot?
i have a 3-5-2, one midfielder was booked and i missed to change the squad myself. the match report showed that the a.i. brought a player in, but not as a midfielder but a sriker. so i played 3-4-3 & had obviously a big disadvantage b/c “i” changed the formation from 352 to 343 /normally 60-70 shots, this time 18) …
currently it’s the “brazilian” rule: the number of games won decides in first place.
I’m not a friend of too much limitations: neither transfer prices nor wages.
it’s a market driven component of the game. i don’t like the idea to to support minor teams with a cap (tranfer & wage) to have a chance getting 1st class players. where’s the challenge in that?
one way for smaller teams is to acquire underrated oldies & talented youths to improve and earn more money e.g via merchandising (Star player – we need the “*” from ssim ;)) and would be more attractive for players they are interested in. and do reselling to build a capital.
I’m missing the more “intuive” decising making of players: i guess it’s a lack of the current system: it’s just driven by numbers – the wage. it would be important to choose from a LARGER VARIETY OF OPTIONS when you propose to a player: further contracts details like the “big club clause”, first team “guarantee” (for 1 season), to cancel a contract after not winning a title or not qualifying for CL or if the club relegates etc. …
that would increase the chances of smaller: when they take a more risky approach. So wage would be just one out of several parameters to consider.
great, guys! i made a thread for further improvements on this topic in “Suggestions”: http://www.rubysoccer.com/forums/3/topics/460
First, great to see the 3-turn-rule for transfer listings implemented!
Conceirning this new rule i’d like to mention the following:
a) it should be allowed to make a bid lower than the asked price
– it expresses the interest of the market, but also the demanded price might be too high
– the seller can lower the minimum (if not, the bids will be withdrawn automatically after 3 turns, beginning with the first bid made)
b) following “a”,
– offering a transfer price and offering the player a contract should be made seperately
– first the transfer price and AFTER the final transfer bidding turn all the managers (who put in the demanded tranfser fee) do their offer to the player himself
for me: i love stats!
How about a datebase/overview with all-time-records?
for each league and for each international cup:
- teams table with all played matches (of all seasons)
- teams: longest winning streak or/and streak without losing
- players: most matches
- players: best scorers or/and avg
- players: best golies etc.
in leagues you have the “previous season” option to see the history. IN international cups isn’t an equivalent. How about
a) “previous season” option (with schedule) aswell
b) an hall of fame for each cup: winner, runners-up, the semifinalists (each added with the manager)
guess b/c it’s a “friendly” – think about it: who cares about friendlies (or the B team plying in minor leagues) in RL?
But if not already implemented, i would suggest to depend attendance from the “glory” the opponent has. Matches against teams who are top in their leagues, won several National titles and in best cases, won CL should be attended by a bigger crowd than normal.
In Fulltest friendlies against minor teams had 2000-7000 visitors, when you played ManUtd or Lazio (both very succesfull in FT) you had like 20000-30000 people coming to your test matches.
understood, Gabriel. But what if: playe X is listed 2,95 turns for 20M (worth ~2M) and 5 minutes before 3 turns are over the seller lowers minimum to 1M. His friend enters 1M & the deal’s done.
first the transfer listing time should be postponed – like i suggested in another thread ~3ticks minimum.
i see a problem in your case, matty. what if someone bids on my players and i’m not online to check which bidders i wanna drop. like my “rival” bid just 1 minute before tick closing … therefore a block/boycott function would be still usefull.
i agree. it should cost some effort yourself to have an advantage on information (like player imrovements). Not everything should be be tansparent/visualized out-of-the-box.
boycott: why not ? It’s like having rivals or “enemies” in RL … some clubs you just don’t like or you have made bad experiences with the other manager …
but: you shouldn’t be allowed to blck more than, let’s say, 25% of all (not a.i. managed) clubs worldwide.
My club in fast ticker (Hertha) sold 4 players to a minor club of my country. the first 3 transfers were ok for me, but i would have favoured the option not to sell the 4th player to the same club …
i guess it would be nice to select for each player you put on the TL, if you offer him to (clubs from) all countries or just to some or exclude some clubs in special.
well, i see it as an disadvantage for the (in this case German) League with regard on the Nation ranking/ UEFA points b/c the number of teams that may collect points for their nation/league is reduced automatically in early stages.
in fast ticker, Champions League, First round:
Stuttgart (Ger) vs Karlsruhe (Ger)
In RL two clubs of the same country don’t play each other in early stages …
First: great to have the option to loan players!
i saw some teams offer their youth player for loaning. For my fast ticker side is no option available to loan the youth player … why?
currently a player can be sold within 1 minute: player listed, interested manager bids, tick closes the deal, finish.
I think that’s not healthy & fair. If a player X is listed for let’s say 500k he should stay on TL in FT&MT for 3 turns. Starting with the first bid. So it’s more transparent to a wider manager audience and the chance of secret agreements of two parties is lower.
for the instance that the seller changes his minimum price, the minimum listing period should start again from this point on. b/c if someone lists his player for 6M, another manager bids 6M, and 5 Minutes before 3 turns are over, seller puts the minimum down to 500k (b/c it’s a “friend” he’s selling to), and the buyer lowers his bid as well.