That’s because it is your coaching level that matters. I know, it is counter intuitive so the message needs to be more specific. I didn’t want managers to rely on the team loaning the player having decent coaching, so the easiest way was to always consider the owning team coaching level.
You are correct about pressure handling. If I remember correctly the only performance related trait that is applicable to national teams is the plays better/worse on second half.
Critério de gols fora, vc fez 1 gol fora e tomou 2 em casa.
National team managers are now able to select any class S or class A players to the squad instead of being strictly limited on what the game considers to be the best for a particular position. Where there are not enough players with those classes for a given position you will still see additional players listed as options.
Very good question and your assumption is correct. For trait purposes only club international cups are relevant.
90
Wow, C and D are a bit sad :-(
The error margin of suggested wages has been reduced by 25%. Hopefully your negotiations team will give you better wage suggestions from now on. Of course you can still get the odd suggestion (less frequently now), especially at lower investment levels, in which case you should probably follow your gut.
Player A: 88
Player B: 92
You forgot to mention the all-English CL final between us ;-)
I’ve got to tell you I planned to leave EPL soon, but your post has all the reasons why I will stay a bit longer.
That probably means your negotiations investment level is low. I’ve seen that happen to people every now and then and personally I feel it is not that bad in general, but it doesn’t mean I’m right!
I could potentially increase the accuracy of the suggested wage overall, so that lower levels had a higher chance of getting it right…or maybe I could change the whole mechanic so that instead of showing a bad suggestion you would get no suggestion at all, would this be better or worse?
I also use Google Chrome and I haven’t noticed any significant change lately. Curious to know from others.
You can currently do that as a forced transfer attempt, even though I understand it is not exactly the same because you will be wasting it just so the manager receives a message and also the manager will not be sure you whether you were just making an offer or trying to “steal” the player.
I think you are right, it makes sense to allow a non-forced offer to a player owned by a human manager, and message him/her about it.
Do they have high wages? That would be one obvious reason…the others could be:
1) There are better “first team”players that CPU teams can afford for the same position
2) There are better “potential” players that CPU teams can afford for the same position
Players will now automatically return from loan if their “first division” or “team qualified for international cup” clauses are breached when the teams that had loaned them are relegated or knocked out from an international cup, respectively.
When next step says “I’m not sure” it just means the report is inconclusive. When it says player won’t improve anymore then you can be sure his evolution is over.
Very unlikely, only if EVERYONE leave ;-)
Interesting perspective! Just a small correction, this is not soccersim and was not even built on top of it. Soccersim was just an inspiration for us to create our own game when that one went offline :-D
There are two, one with only Portuguese-speaking members and an international one. The first one is extremely active and people discuss lots of things there, not only Goal FC topics, but the second one never got any real traction and some members even left. Happy to engage on that one but I understand some managers may not be willing to provide their phone numbers, which is understandable, Discord would be better then.
Just joined that, hopefully others become interested :-)
When firing retiring players the contract break fee is now calculated based on end of season or contract end date, whatever comes first. Previously it was calculated always based on contract end date, even when it happened to be after player retirement.
Currently one but he is really second-class…and I have one still in the youth list that looks promising.
That is an interesting idea and a good alternative to allowing scout reports for specific players, even though the scout option is easier to implement.
You will now get messages when a player from your hotlist goes to the free transfer. Transfer listing was already covered and we had this gap for a long time, it has finally been addressed.
I do feel that would help a lot and agree that scouts are mostly used for finding players with good potential rather than established players. I’ve always thought there is some merit in browsing the lists trying to find suitable players for your team, but it does take a lot of time and some people just can’t afford it. I’m sure some managers will still defend separate lists as we have today, but lately I’m more and more inclined to have some kind of search centre or at least more global lists as you mentioned.
I guess a native app would be a more attractive way to play the game in a mobile phone, not to mention potentially a better way to attract players. Although I agree the game experience in the mobile and desktop is currently very similar, an app would allow us to make use of a number of cool things such as gestures, notifications and other native features. There will be some challenges for sure as Goal FC is not what your regular mobile game, but we’ll do our best to start simple and build on top of that.
And don’t worry, the poll result does not mean we will completely stop adding new features or fixing bugs until the app is ready, it is just a guidance for us.
Thanks for voting in our poll, here are the results:
1) Mobile app
2) Rating based substitutions
3) Show last player improvement
4) Smooth estimated value transition between classes
Work has started for the app but given the results above we’ll try to focus on it a bit more to get it ready sooner. We’ll post some updates on Facebook as we have them.
I think some of these 500 million deals are mostly pre-agreed swap deals between managers. If that becomes an issue we could reduce the maximum transfer listed amount for a player, but I don’t feel that’s the right thing to do at the moment. In the past there was a lot more communication in the forums and we need to get that communication going again to have a more vibrant transfer market.
To be honest I don’t mind the negative traits about cards and injuries that much and I also have plenty of players that use more stamina…not saying it is not hard to manage them…hehe. Completely agree on the “Plays worse against teams with a class worse than his team”, it is a real downer and I have only one first team player with that trait, but that’s because it’s only a -1.
I see a couple main options here:
Three changes related to contract renewals: