Recent Posts
18,555 posts(s) found
It’s a very nice idea, i would certainly love to try it. It could make the player movement part of the game a lot more challenging and attractive :)
i agree
I would suggest that you create a period for the transfer occurred.
As in European football we could have a window at the beginning and another mid-season.
I would also suggest that revenues from ticket sales doubled making the poorest teams could get more revenue to invest and thus balance the game.
- Post removed by admins *
Thnks, I think this will be important for this project sustainability.
For example, HP is going to stop manufacturing or selling PCs, so mobile platforms (phones, tabs, iPod and similars) are going to be cheaper and really more popular
- Post removed by admins *
- Post removed by admins *
I’m ok with any changes made what so ever. As long as we are allowed to know what the exact changes are and atleast some effects. This way I and the rest can readup about it and start learning how to adapt to it.
@Davison: You know you can always e-mail me with questions. Try for future refence to be a little bit more constructive. It’s easy to complain about everything. Heck, I like doing it aswell. I get those silly losses aswell, where I’m clueless as to how the hell I lost. I usually think……shit happens. It will happen to others aswell, so in the end we all suffer from it. It doesn’t help to just complain about it. Try to suggest some solutions for certain situation. Like you did about the cheaters. Personally I would never let a fired manager be able to manage a top team which opend up. I must admit I liked your suggestion about letting them only be able to apply to div2 teams. Try to keep that up. Give suggestions and solutions instead of criticism and complaints.
On a side note, it’s nice to know Gabriel and Danilo are still working on it, but like charles said….it’s a free game. They do this stuff in there spare time and we need to respect that.
Keep up the good work Gabriel and Danilo!!
P.s.: If you touch france….you touch me :). Be warned about mentioning anything france related :).
Sport Lisboa e Benfica (SLB! SLB!)
A couple of years back they broke the record for most fan memberships to claim to have the biggest fan base. I’m sure fans of Europes giant teams will disagree but hey, they did it.
From Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.L._Benfica
“Benfica has more than 14 million fans and the Guinness World Record for the football club in the world with most members.”
Just to be precise, I am a Canadian of French/Armenian origins. Pretty much all of what Dhimitri said offended me! :P
In all seriousness, Marc please relax man. I asked you to give constructive criticism and you’re taking a “bashing” tone once again. I guess there’s no point beating the topic of your behavior anymore as it seems most have given up on trying to be nice to you.
Like Filipe said, the game is what it is. It’s fine to complain about it if there are things you think should be changed. but expecting the amount of changes you complain about in a small period of time is unrealistic. (even if you have been complaining for a long time, no pun intended on you, i agree some things about this game needs to change) Besides, you always have to take into consideration the big picture. If you change one thing, it might break other things.
I think both Danilo and Gabriel usually have an easier time implementing extra features that won’t affect others. This way we get extra stuff while they are working on longer projects (improvements). We have to be patient with these guys, there’s really no point forcing them into doing anything because in the end this is a free game and it is still in development stage. We don’t want to push the devs away by being pricks and demanding change. Sometimes things need to take their natural path towards maturity. I’m pretty sure that is how SS/MS was built, with time and paying great attention to detail.
For the record, i’m open to ANY change that would be implemented.
Lastly, @Davison, good delivery or not, you sure as heck know how to get people involved in hot topics, it bodes well for the future of RS.
Option 2!!
(Viva La France)
Henry – I am Canadian!!
São Paulo FC, the biggest one!
Option 2 is the ONLY way to go.
But it has to go with some other changes so it makes it all so much more logical.
It has to be done together with changes to how players develop.
Instead of having maximum possible skill, there are other ways to do it, I’ll mention it to the developers next time.
BK
The 100 years war is back on between the England and France, I see!!! And as usual, those damned arrogant French have hijacked my ranting thread, because they are always so sure that their ranting is so much more lyrical :P
PS: Charles is French of “Canadien” origin. That alone would make any decent American cringe. Next thing you know, Charles might become the second worst thing to Satan in the Bible Belt. And soon enough, CNN would report of suspicious WMD in Charlestan. A Dutch humanist in the shape of Sly, would enter the scene on behalf of CharleStan to set things straight on the logic of the beloved Dutch multiculturalism that is about to sink Netherlands well below the sea level. But the Brits would have none of it and would send 00Davidson7 to punk the mood up and push the damn red button. Finally, the quiet German comes in and sets things straight by putting the Brits and the French in their place. The Germans are specialists in law and order, let’s remember how they set the old bitch (Europe) straight not once by twice. But this time, they will get a tad smarter and avoid those Red Russians! Meanwhile, in the background, the Turks are on the rise! The stockexchanges ring their closing bells and Facebook has gotten greener and Steve Jobs mighty richer (and a heck more philosophical). :P
So, back to the topic.
It would be sad to lose the replay, but if it is replaced by detailed commentary replay, then why not. Option 2 seems indeed more interesting as opposed to single variables that cause too much imbalance in the current state. If more emphasis can be put on tactics and overall quality of the team.
The current engine efficiency can be defined by a simple statement: Tackle and shoot vs Speedy Keeper.
I don’t know how long will take for a different structure to be implemented, and maybe it’s not worth the time. at the end of the day it’s only two people taking care of business, who also have to deal with RL issues, just like the rest of us.
I would say that improvements are in order. How they come about, it’s up to the developers! As Felipe said earlier, we have all adapted and still manage to enjoy this game. I’m sure we will adapt even in the future :)
- Post removed by admins *
- Post removed by admins **
- Post removed by admins *
fuck off filipe so its ok for you to talk shit to me lol always gotta bring in your lil digs just like other idiots on here stfu you look like a frog lol @ your facebook dont talk shit and you wouldnt have a problem with me. dont be mad because i have an opinion that differs to yours. and i think your advice was not asked for i dont care about your opinion either cos obviously your a fucking idiot
Davison the good thing seems to be that no one cares about what you think anymore, for much that we try to explain to you how much of those things work you simply prefer to assume they are all wrong because you can’t get good results of them… No solution will ever be good enough for you I’m afraid…
I have no preference, both seem fine to me and whatever the change is I’ll try to understand it and adapt to it, Davison will simply say it is bullshit.
option 2 is also my option im sure. let the personal attacks begin.
I favour option 2.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/174226 99 shooting top scorer 27 year old for sale need to rebuild defense so im selling my best player to bring in the cash for a rebuild so i can battle for premier league champ once agian
Ajax
Don’t pull my words out of context :). I told you, for a team like yours who is not fighting for 3 titles (yet) that it is a waste of money. It would’t make such a huge difference for you if 1 avarage player was back quicker. You are still growing those superstars and don’t have them yet. Thus, I felt it was silly for a team like yours to have Physio 10 and called it a waste of money :).
Now, I believe I also said, that at times when a crucial player get’s hurt and you need him back asap, you can upgrade to coaching 10 just for that 1 player. Then you can downgrade again when he’s back. I’m sure in the end it won’t cost that much more. Besides, it’s only fake money :)
I’ll e-mail you in game with some extra info.
you have a bad habit screing people over and you have done it 3 times when buying players so w.e dude just dont bother bidding on my players and i wont bother on yours.
with that said the formations are retarded, when you field your formation non of them bare any resemblance to any real life formation.
players dont act realistic all group together like a congealing snowball
the formation screen isnt even symetrical. cant fire players when you want to, ( cheaters are allowed to manage top clubs after being banned yet i think there should be a rule that they must go to a div 2 team manditory and start off with a shit team. wheres the punishment ?
transfer prices are stupid
scouting is a waste of money most of the time
physio is ok but apparently ive been told by brest it is also a waste of money
stadium is a waste of investment
game results
the list is long
International competition spots were redistributed for South American countries based on real life distribution but adjusted to be dynamic rather than fixed. If you take Libertadores for example, Brazil and Argentina have 5 spots each and all other countries have 3. In RubySoccer the first two South American countries in the country ranking will have 5 spots and other countries will have 3. A similar logic was applied to Copa Sudamericana, first South American country will have 8 spots, second 6 spots and all others 3 spots.
We know that there are other rules like the previous champion is automatically qualified, but we are not implementing those…at least not just yet.
Cheers.
its funny that in turn Brest trusts me. I’ve made a lot of friendships here at Ruby Marc. I regularly exchange emails with many managers. (including you) Sometimes people change their minds, sometimes people can’t make up their minds and other times a series of unfortunate events occur and good deals are removed off the table. You make it sound as tough i’m always at fault. You had the chance to negotiate with my player for over a day and you didn’t close the deal. I sold a few other players in the meantime and decided to remove him off the list. Sorry but it happens sometimes.
Now reply what you think about Gabriels post. You are the most vocal about this game not being up to par, not being realistic, poor scouting, poor this poor that…
If you really want a good game, help out with the Ruby community by posting constructive criticism. I’m sure it’ll make everyones experience a lot funner and most importantly, you’ll get to contribute to how good Ruby can become.
charles
hey charles have some integrity and respect and you wouldnt be treated this way by me. you have time after time fed me over not just once not just twice a total of 3 times you dont care about building a friendship on here or doing the right thing, your just like every other manager.
the only manager on here that i trust is Brest
@Gabriel
Is option 2 really an option? This game has been in development for 5+ years now (give or take) and we’ve been working with this engine all this time. Do you really have a structure in place to actually test out option 2?
I’m all up for trying new things, but right now tick times are about 15minutes (which i find is not long at all) and wouldn’t mind seeing longer tick times if it means more detailed game engine (closer to a true football match)
However, I do agree your opinion on option 2 “Even if it takes longer to implement and test I like the idea of rewriting the current engine in a way that allows easier tactical improvements in the future.” If it makes it easier to improve the game in the future, perhaps a longer to implement option is not a bad idea…
Booo at Charles and Martin!!!!! -—→ “input reason here…..”