Recent Posts
18,535 posts(s) found
Hmmm, that’s a good question…I suppose you had midfielders available to replace him, right? Anyway, I’ll let Danilo take this one, he is more familiar with this area than me.
Monaco x Benfica
4 × 0
4-4-2 formação 4-4-2
51% posse de bola 49%
30 chutes 36
27 chutes a gol 34
95% passes certos 96%
36% roubadas efetivas 37%
6 escanteios 6
0 impedimentos 2
10 faltas 12
i have no clue dirk :) but i have to post this to, to funny:
14 min: Martín (h) is injured.
14 min: Pecile (h) replaces Martín (h)
21 min: Pecile (h) is injured.
Both 4 ticks back pain..lol?
Update from version 0.1.8 to 0.1.8a
Change:
- Minor fix: Now it works correctly without www inside rubysoccer url
You have to access rubysoccer from: http://www.rubysoccer.com (with www in URL)
Version 0.1.8a will work without www too.
When i change the 0 to my own team number the script stops working, why?
Update from version 0.1.6 to 0.1.8
Changes:
- New column TN: How many turns was necessary to player change his skills.
This idea is somewhat complex and difficult, because it can increase the number of cheating in the game because I can create a technical team and leave it and only 10 get to train my player, so my team would leave in the 0 level of technical and would ecomizando a lot besides being with my future guaranteed, what you can do is put as a loan player to the club that takes him borrow club pays their wages and that gave the player also continue paying his salary .
in my opinion you should choose the field where the batter of penalty should be a list of the 11 subjects and also with the reserves, who would then up the tactic could choose the sequence that he wants it to help when a dispute was for the penalty.
I would compare Alberto, the king, to Pelé, the prince ;) LOL
My midfielder Bonaquista (M+1)was injured in the CL match against Bayern Munchen. Nothing wrong with it. The stange thing is that he was substituted by De Molceperes (an attacker). However I made a formation strategie to replace an injured midfielder by the best midfielder. I also checked the used formation.
.
What went wrong?
Unfortunately not, when the selected player is not present the player who suffered the foul or the closest player takes the penalty kick. I know, we need to change that! :)
i think your best attacker in line will take the penalty. Should be better to let it be the best shooter take it, even if it’s not an A.
But don’t pin me on this comment, i’m not sure either :)
I recently had a penalty after my selected taker had been substituted, my worst shoot striker then took this penalty. Now assuming that your best shoot player is the best to take this, surely it would be better to put it into the game that when your selected kick taker is not available (injury/substituion) then the next best player available should take over?
people have different strategies at different times… and who can be so sure people will let only their substandard players to be loaned in that way…
if i had a very good young player (not enough to be in the first team), i would definitely let him play at another team for certain fee… ( although i would have to have my finance at its best)…
the only problem i see with this approach is this might be abused to give away money to another club. And i believe concerned club board should be very much strict in this matter and regularly moderated. Limits on max amount you want to pay and the number of players you want to go away for this kind of loan should be defined by the board. Also it needs to be constrained that only your best players are a part of that loan deal…
What team wants to get payed to let low 70/80’s stats players ruin there team? I think we need more interaction from the CPU teams, alot of them can do better if the loan/buy some players.
nice idea actually…
sometimes you know that player will be good, but you just need to give him some time to play.
and we could actually invite someone to develop our players and pay them for doing that, fair thing..
It would be nice if we could settle wage from -100 to 100%. I mean, if we could offer money to other team to train our player.
I have some players that dont have good skills to loan, but I have interess to pay for it
Unfortunately yes…but it’s a good thing if you think of it cause you get new stuff AND match engine improvments! Of course the latest may not be ready by Aug 29th…
so my hopes for 29 aug to be a big match engine improvement has fallen apart :(
we all want the engine to be at the best right? to do so we need to complain to improve it :) and it’s not crying, it’s just posting weird things u notice.
I’m not crying damago… i’m just posting weird results in my opinion ;) :)
COME ON!!! People should just complain when winning big time, because they score so many goals, but no, so many people just crying like babies…….. CLEANEXXXXXX
i want to hate your system for this gab (wanted to be be more specific, but don’t know which one of you developed this part, dan or gab)… he was one of my best talents… :(
This was my prediction for him ( based on his developments, although u changed that superstar factor by 2% )
Tac Pas Sho Spe Dri Ctr Hea
78 89 98 83 95 91 84
Congratulations to Gondomar
Another weird result
Livorno – Genoa 0-0
0 × 0
3-4-3 formation 3-5-2
57% possession 43%
13 shots 23
12 shots on target 19
93% accurrate passes 95%
56% effective tackles 54%
3 corners 2
8 offsides 4
8 fouls 7
4 Livorno midfielders against 5 of mine and still 57% of possession for Livorno…..COME ON….
As I’ve said in the other topic (http://www.rubysoccer.com/forums/6/topics/1216), I’ll go back to the match engine :)
Ok, that’s it, I’ll go back to the match engine, I promise :)
Unfortunately, yes :(
confirmed… the problem is still there :( got the same message twice even when the transfer amount didn’t change…
up