Recent Posts
18,548 posts(s) found
As in the real game, here we also need to deal with it. We have replacements for these occasions. There’s no way you have international players and not have them sometimes low, the game is. I know it’s sad to lose one of the best players as well, but we need to deal with it.
Computer says no.
My best defender was also injured in an international friendly just before my CL match. I was glad I won the first match with 4-0 so I didn’t really need him.
He was injured for 3 turns…luckily there were no important games in this period.
It’s annoying Charles but I guess we have to deal with it. It’s the first time one of my 3 internationals get hurt in an international friendly.
Danny Berkley
would like him back i bought him like 30 + ticks ago put in the request back then.
would like the player i bought who i didnt agree to loan in real life when a player is bought that is out on loan goes to the team that bought him
fix this
thats twice in less than a week I get one of my best players hurt in international friendlies… just prior to my CL games… getting pretty annoying… anyone else find that lately its been worse?
Maybe the loan system is making things worse too.. A medium would be nice, i just want a couple of million to keep my club going lol
i believe cpu teams have run out of money…
and base price of players is way too inflated…
Yes, it seems that it is only possible to have cpu teams buy lots of players for too high prices, or to have them not buy anything at all, even at the cheapest price possible. A middle way would be nice.
Ive had a few of my players for sale for a while now and i keep lowering their price, now they are at the minium the board will let me sell them for.. Still nothing =/
i had benfica in the same group during the group phase. now i have benfica as my first opponent in the knockout phase.
i know we need to face any opponent, but this seems quite weird that same teams meet in the first knockout round after the group phase
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/international_cups?cup=5&round=F&season=66 (knock out phase)
I think that was meant to work with real managers, since the loaning to computer managed clubs is new, I am guessing, programmers did not do that intelligence for computer controlled clubs to decide on such requests.
It’s not a bug/feature, maybe lack of enough functionality due the new feature.
I think when you loan out a player you shouldn’t be able to recall him back before the end of loan period.
BK
I have a player loaned to a CPU manager (http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/210012) and i have requested a loan termination. But I haven’t received any feedback and the request is still pending. Feature or defect?
Regards,
Jorge Correia
FastTicker, Portugal, Benfica
SLB, SLB, SLB… GLORIOSO SLB
Can’t believe last post was by me almost a month ago…
Alavez has a few good young players and veterans for sale. 5 to 10mil$… pretty cheap for guys who will become 87 average players in the future or guys that can help your team out right away.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/381
The same bug as http://www.rubysoccer.com/forums/2/topics/2119 perhaps?
Yes this is very strange.
In the screen “Matches”, at turn number4, I can choose one of my formation to play the game.
1 16-human Gimnasia Jujuy 3 x 0 Kalamata 16-computer Won Friendly Report
4 16-human Gimnasia Jujuy x Dijon 16-human Friendly
6 16-human Gimnasia Jujuy 9 x 0 Dijon 16-human Won Friendly Report
i was going through dijon’s page and i found this friendly (seems at turn 4) sandwiched between turn 46 and 47…
44 16-human Gimnasia Jujuy 5 × 0 Dijon 16-human Friendly 16-match_replay
45 16-human Dijon 2 × 1 Libourne 16-computer Ligue 1 16-match_replay
46 16-human Dijon 2 × 0 Lens 16-computer Coupe de France 16-match_replay
4 16-human Gimnasia Jujuy x Dijon 16-human Friendly
47 16-human Dijon x Gimnasia Jujuy 16-human Friendly
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_info/233
Twente did play with subs the whole second round, therefore I have to apologise from both managers.
Regards
Season 65 was a strange one, with a lot of clubs having winning and losing streaks. Defending champion PSV had a bad season and only just managed to qualify for European football. The number 17 of two seasons ago, Haarlem, managed to win both the league and the cup this year. Computer teams took place two and three while De Graafschap took the important sixth place just before AGOVV.
But next season everything might be totally different..
In Group no.7, the match between Juventus and Twente ended with a 14-1 victory for Juventus.
I just hope that Twente plays with substitutes in the other two matches left, otherwise it will be a major fraud and cheating.
Thanks for your time.
Best regards
Costas
Selected maximum age 30, I still get results with players up to age 39.
Berhan
Concordo perfeitamente com o que dizes, tal como tambem é importante saber se houve mudanças e quais? e o que podemos fazer, pois as nossas equipas sao muito competitivas e estao a deixar de ser escandalosamente. e ja agora era importante saber como se esta a proceder aos emprestimos versus evolução?
abraço
nah, you still don’t get it.
But get this, when no one buys him for 163M, when you are ready to settle for my offer, do send me an ingame mail, I might make you an offer, if he is not 38 years old by then.
BK
After Dhimiter’s ( Cardiff ) disaperance from the game looks like Filipe (Newcastle) also left , its a shame .Anyway, looking forward to compete in premier legue next season, good luck to all.
Maybe you can repost it at http://www.rubysoccer.com/forums/3 as a suggestion Molinari?
No it isn’t possible. You need to select a position which you want to substitute, but you can substitute him by the best available player on the bench.
At this moment you could select a substitution based on the result at a specific time or you could select an event (injuries or red card).
I think I get it: you made your bid because of your obsession with player value.
Just don’t do it again.
Sorry to ask what seems like a simple question, but is it possible to set a rule so that after a set number of minutes during a match, you take of the worst playing midfielder and replace him with the best available midfielder on the bench? It would seem a little strange it that wasn’t the case, hence why I’m asking :-).
Thanks.
Mudou algo no SIM em relação ao resultado das partidas?
Ele me parece mais aleatório que antes.
Eu tomo como partida os resultados de minhas equipes, tanto no Medium, quanto no Fast.
Está muito mais aleatório que na temporada passada.
Antes, as zebras não eram tão corriqueiras como estão sendo agora.
É só observar as 3 derrotas do San Martin Tucuman na lig do MEDIUM, e as derrotas na Copa e na Libertadores, e alguns jogos do Chacarita Juniors na liga no FAST.
Mudou algo, ou está a mesma coisa?
Abraço
I understand the problem, but the problem is yours, not mine.
The transfer price is unrealistically high, that’s why you think my offer is just just 25%, if you had listed him for 50M and I offered 40M it would be 80%, no? You would have sold him for 50M, as people would know he is worth that money. I am guessing you will not sell him for 163M unless someone just wants to make a joke about this.
You base your price on the player value which you can not convince me is worth for the player (163M), I do my own evaluation and make a bid for the worth of the player, it has nothing to do with the listed price. I have explained to you more than once and if you still refuse to understand how I reason, which is your problem here since you complain on me bidding what I bid, then there is not much I can do.
About my bids in general, just ask people I have dealt with, when they ask reasonable prices and not some fantasy figures as you do. I do bid what I can pay for the quality of the player and do so when I have the money, when I don’t I ask them if they can lower the price. I made a perfectly reasonable offer for your player and can still offer you the same amount if you are interested, even if I am in a different club now.
BK
I don’t think you understand the problem. It has nothing to do with player value: it has to do with the transfer price. It’s ok to bid a bit less than the transfer price. A bit less than 25% of the transfer price is either stupid or just to annoy. And I saw you did bids like that more often…