Ok. They have 11 players but 2 of them are GK. Maybe that’s the problem.
That’s strange, even though Torino has 11 players, I’ve just seen a match report where there were only 10 lined up, that is not supposed to happen. I’ll fire the manager anyway, he’s been absent since mid october.
How many players must be in the line-up at the beginning of a match because I see that Torino for example has only 10 players in the line-up and can play the match without a W.O. report. I just noticed it.
Sorry about all the mess with Napoli Commanche but I have a job in sales so I’ve been away in and out of the office for the past several weeks. This hasn’t left me much time to take care of the team…
I am quite sure. I did saw my formation minutes before the game and I do not have a 4-3-3 formation configured. If it happen again I’ll post again.
Danilo has just fixed it.
Oops! Looks like we have a bug. :-)
Thanks for reporting, we’ll look into it.
Hi!
When I try to chose “Contracts” in the “Players” Menu I always get:
-———-
RubySoccer System Error
Oops! It looks like there was an error.
-———-
It seems that maybe there is a problem in that menu
Thanks!!!
Are you sure there is no defender placed on M – 1 instead of D +1 for instance? That would make a 3-4-3 instead of a 4-3-3 :-)
check patrick getting dominated by other italian teams!
Hi, I am on Newcastle on dimension 2. After playing this game http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/31216 I checked that the formation that was reported was 4-3-3. This is wrong… I used 3-4-3… and I checked before and there was no player unavailable.
thanks,
Ricardo Marques
yep, dont worry. this will probably go away soon, with a few new versions that are coming out.
I’m sorry I just saw there already is a topic about an incomplete match report. But I ’ve already reported it.
I think there is a bug in my match report for Vicenza – Cagliari. (beta 1-Italy)) The result is 0-3 but in the match report there are only 2 goals scored. The last sentence is “the referee shows”. Maybe the match report is not complete. It’s not so important for me who scored the goal but maybe you can take a look at it.
“Also, the ability to offer transfer price below or above what the seller is offering.”
right, that would be a plus – but the transfer listed price shall change automatically with the acceptance of a lower bid.
AND
the minimum time a player is on th TL should be 3 ticks (starting from the first bid) or even more
AND
what about the highest bid? if someone likes to pay more to negotiate alone? therefore a “drop bidder” option for the seller must be implemented.
I think to make initially generated players better to create a more vibrant transfer market. At the moment I’m trying to find a good defender to improve my team – it’s very difficult to find any choice of good players. Also, the ability to offer transfer price below or above what the seller is offering.
I think step by step is ok
But who want more elaborated, can do that now, here, same the others did
Give them, Philipp, a more precise name for all the teams, now, and will be easy for them to update
But…if you dont know all, just start with what we have
I think we are used to see team names in the short form here in Brazil, that’s why we did it that way :-)
Here we call São Paulo Futebol Clube → São Paulo, Clube de Regatas do Flamengo → Flamengo and even Benfica that you gave as an example we call just Benfica.
But if it is a general opinion that we should change that we can certainly do it. Or maybe have someone from each country to tell us how team names are usually written in his/her country.
Cheers.
understood, but i meant not the fullll name, but a more precise.
São Paulo Futebol Clube
could be São Paulo FC
I agree with Danilo, the team info screen may display a full name in the future, but screens like league table, team matches should display the short version
I agree that we have to put that info somewhere (someday), but we shouldnt use this information on the table… In Brazil, for example, we have large team names, like São Paulo Futebol Clube. This kind of name can easily mess up our screens.
Wouldn’t it be nicer to have the full team names, not just the short versions or cities?
like
“Benfica Lissabon” or “Olympique Marseille”
instead of
“Benfica” or “Marseille”
I’m looking for some friendlies to make my youth players better. So challenge me…
Cagliari – Beta 1
Regards
Thanks Tiago!
I’ll update our files today.
France:
ligue 1
Auxerre
Bordeaux
Caen
Le Mans
Lens
Lille
Lorient
Lyon
Marseille
Metz
Monaco
Nancy
Nice
Paris-SG
Rennes
Saint-Etienne
Sochaux
Strasbourg
Toulouse
Valenciennes
ligue 2
AC Ajaccio
Amiens
Angers
Bastia
Boulogne-sur-Mer
Brest
Châteauroux
Clermont Foot
Dijon
Grenoble
Gueugnon
Guingamp
Le Havre
Libourne
Montpellier
Nantes
Niort
Reims
Sedan
Troyes
Thanks Ricardo!
Managers get sacked after 1 month of inactivity. I know, it is too much, but we have to implement holiday mode before reducing this period.
Portuguese 1st League:
FC Porto
Benfica
Sporting
V. Guimarães
Marítimo
V. Setúbal
Sp. Braga
Belenenses
E. Amadora
Nacional
Académica
Naval
Leixões
Boavista
P. Ferreira
U. Leiria
Portuguese 2nd league:
Santa Clara
Vizela
Rio Ave
Estoril
Trofense
Beira Mar
Varzim
Olhanense
Gil Vicente
Fátima
Freamunde
Feirense
D. Aves
Portimonense
Gondomar
Penafiel
Cheers.
first ideas (some from Toni):
loaning players
Planned substitutions
Managers get sacked after x days of inactivity
Minimum period before selling
Coaches & traning
“save as”-button for tactics
Dimensions table shows how many teams are free and how many managers are online. Inside the dimension, it is possible to see who are the online users.