Now I remember :)
And yes, Flamengo is my club in real life.
That’s ok, I made the second suggestion a few months ago ;)
http://rubysoccer.com/forums/3/topics/1243The number of friendlies played each season on the player stats would also be helpful
Sds
PS: Você torce pro Flamengo, Gabriel?
They probably will, the portuguese crew did very bad, I’m probably the worse… and now the others about to be eliminated…
There is no reason for them not to be able to trade 7 players other than the possibility of cheating, which in that case didn’t occurred… You may be suspicious about that manager history but I’m sure about the other :)
Talk to me in private so we can use names :D this twou and one and other is too confuse
Btw, France could jump to the second place in the country ranking (1st in Europe) next season :)
Anyone noticing how French teams are completely turning CL upside down?
Qualifying Stages
Suprise 1: Auxerre 6-3 agg Arsenal
Group Stages
Suprise 2&3$4
Group 2
Pos Team P W D L GF GA Pts
1 Auxerre France 6 3 2 1 14 13 11
2 Napoli Italy 6 2 3 1 14 13 9
3 Brest France 6 2 1 3 17 14 7
4 Getafe Spain 6 2 0 4 14 19 6
Auxerre wins the Group stage against giants like Napoli and Getafe and the ever present Brest
Group 4
Marsellie and Monaco win the group by eliminating the giants of A Madrid and Bayern
Quarterfinals
Surprises continue
Benfica Portugal x France Monaco 3 × 5
Napoli Italy x Germany Hertha BSC 0 × 0
Blackpool England x France Auxerre 3 × 2
Marseille France x Portugal Rio Ave 4 × 0
The Portuguese giants are thrashed and Auxerre stands a good chance to qualify vs Blackpool.
There’s the possibility for 3 French Teams to be in the Semis, hence one could already be in the final
We’ll add a history record informing a player went pro. About your other suggestion, what was that again? Sorry for not remembering, too many suggestions in my mind :P
Considering that, during the youth academy, players receive double experience, it’d be interesting if the player history displayed the moment that the player went PRO and how many friendly matches they played each season.
On another topic, any plans to add my other suggestion about turns remainning on contract renewals?
I have no reasons to believe it’s not working since there were no updates to the match engine since that change was implemented…and it was working by that time :)
I don’t care if the managers know each other or not. I just think it’s stupid to have 7 transfers in 1 season between 2 team. Sounds kinda unfair. I like the “trade+cash” idea. It brings some depth to an otherwise simple Football manager game I can easely play on my desktop offline. But 7 players? Are kidding me? Again I refer to managersim. I like all above idea’s. Limitations for new managers, wage caps etc etc. Btw Filipe, if you know who I refer to, then you also know 1 of these managers was fired before. Idea’s given above here in this topic could have prevented the way this manager “cheated”.
Sly, If you are refering to the teams I think you are there is nothing smelling wrong :D I know both managers from diferent places and they don’t know eachother, I believe that was an exchange of players arrangement by them… But it may be other case since the ones I’m talking about are here for some time…
About the rule I’m in favour, in FM we can even chose transfers not to be accessible in the firs season…
Football Manager (desktop, not online) has a transfer budget defined on season start. It is always less than your amount of money and a percentage of the profit from players being sold is added to this budget. Similarly there is a wage budget. I think we could use this idea and improve them based on how long the manager has been in the game and how long has the manager been in the team.
gabriel,
is that stamina percentage deduction thing working properly???
i lost an away match to a team whose average stamina was 74%. my first team was better than his and i was playing with 4-5 players above 30…
i just had a similiar idea, maybe this a good point to bring it up.
how about a limit that new managers can spend in their new club within the first season. Like 10% of the club capital, maximum 15M. Maybe this would slow down cheaters.
Just an idea, not sure if it’ thats clever or not …
Not yet, we’ll announce when the changes I’m working on are applied.
Interesting. Maybe just 1 or 2 transfter if it is a fresh/novice manager
If manager has more than 3 seasons he can trade 4 players
I´m very surprise with my last game against Real Madrid in FT.
Our first match I win (3×5) playing as guest. The second playing home and with a new and much better goalkeeper I lost (1×2). All my team have crap scores comparing with other games. We both play almost with the same squad and formation and all my player were playing with 97+ stamina
I am :)
interesting…
Managersim use to have a rule that made sure 2 teams could only have a total of 3 transfers between each other each season.
I think this can be intresting. I don’t want to point anyone out just yet, but I’ve seen certain teams have 7 transfers between each other. Now thats just sad and unrealistic. I think this embargo could also potentially stop cheating way’s. I meen, I’ve been playing this game for about 16 seasons now, and I think I’ve never had more then 2 transfers from 1 team. Now…to get 7, that just doesn’t smell right :).
Anyone in favour?
Sunderland can sell any player
send me a message and the amount u are willing to throw at that certain player
and ill post him on transfer.
My opinion is that when a team loans a player, a contract is stablished. The old rule was bad for the teams who used loaned players. When someone says “you can use my player for 144ticks”, it should really mean that, not “you can use it until who nows when”…
A sell after the loan shoudn’t prejudice the loaner.
So, I think this new rule ir correct.
As a suggestion, I think that the buyer should be ablo to choose between taking the player immediatly, paying an indenization to the team who loaned the player. Or he could choose to wait until the end of the loan contract to use him.
already sold…
don’t be jealous… when i got to this team finance was really at a very bad condition. it took me some time but i could hire some free players and sell them at a good price after some time.
i think the only difference was that i was never greedy to ask outrageous prices for my players, which would frighten the suitors… i only asked those prices which i thought i would pay to get those players, so i had more turnover than others. But it doesn’t mean i can sustain going ahead at this rate… i need to have more turnovers to bolster my situation…
UPDATE: another good player sold for a reasonable price. I got him for free too…
I find it weird that so many “low skilled” keepers (85-90 main stat and no 80+ sec) get so many time man of the match which results in getting a nice suckout against teams that are crap!
I’m getting really frustrated to see my stats standing on 60%+ poss and 30+ shots every match and a crap keeper just becomes MOTM and u lose or tie. Seems like it is happening TO MUCH!
Sorry for my shouting and language, but i’m rly getting pissed off at this game.
Player for medium teams. He still grows, but I don’t think he’ll be a worthy CL type player :).
Anderson Pontes
Attributes
Position: D
Side: LC
Keeping: 32
Tackle: 80
Passing: 80
Shooting: 80
Speed: 93
Dribble: 87
Control: 97
Header: 80
3 million
I looked at your team before commenting so I knew why you are selling him. I think he has a high wage.. But it’s getting normal that these kind of players have high wages. I’m jealous at people like you who can afford those wage bills!
Good luck selling! Not to me ;) I have got better options
Which player is it? I couldn’t find any loaned player on your team whose loan contract had already ended.
I’ve loaned a player for a period of 36 turns. Has passed like 40 turns and he didn’t leave. I didn’t renew his loan contract, I want him out! =)
edit: Nevermind, was my mistake. Sorry for wasting your time with this.
Frosinone 1 × 1 Juventus
3-4-3 formation 4-4-2
43% possession 57%
15 shots 30
12 shots on target 27
90% accurrate passes 92%
Looks like i’m just not allowed to win the league? What a big bullshit tbh!!!
i would give a big NOO…
Agents should never get full transfer amount… may be we could pay some percentage… lets say 10%, but 100% will never get my support