Recent Posts
18,542 posts(s) found
Gabriel can you add the option to choose the formation next to the friendlies also for the friendlies you arrange yourself. Now I have sometimes friendlies who are played with the wrong squad because I couldn’t set the right formation in time. When the friendly isn’t accepted right away it’s possible you aren’t on line in time to set the right formation when it is a friendly for one of the next turns.
With the option you can set a formation with will be used if the friendly has been accepted.
The best solution is to make Hertha play with 7 players squad in CL =)
Thanks for your contributions, Dhimitri. We can see the real effects on MediumTicker already. Let’s wait for FastTicker international competitions so we can evaluate it on both dimensions. After that we can make an official poll and decide what is the best solution.
Of course we can keep this discussion going in the meanwhile :)
thanks Gabriel
So, hypothetical situation here Hertha gets 175, and Spain in UEFA gets 240.625 pts. Hertha gains as much as 73% of the pts Spain gets in UEFA with three teams collecting maximum pts. Of course, there’s the country’s average that matters. But the point here is to show than a single teams performing greatly in CL will devalue (or overwhelm) another country’s total performance in UEFA, which in return will unbalance rankings artificially
I think the ranking below would be more convincing
Season 23 European rankings
1.Spain…………………52.232
2.Germany…………….31.771
3.England………………30.729
4.Portugal……………..31.25
5.France……………….26.786
6.Italy…………………..21.429
With the current ranking system, Germany collect the 2d most pts in Europe, all thanks to Hertha. That on its own shows that a single team can greatly affect rankings even now!!!
With the new CL2:1Uefa, by all chances the Germany average would have been higher in pts and the average of some of the countries (the ones who have a good performance in UEFA) would have suffered greatly
New individual tactics: corner tactics.
With this new enhancement you can choose which players should move forward or hold position for a corner kick, and move back or hold position for an opponent corner kick. The option “play position” represents the current behaviour, that is, depending on the player positon he is more or less likely to move forward or back on corners (defenders are more likely to move back on opponent corners and attackers more likely to move forward on offensive corners).
IMPORTANT: these changes won’t affect the match simulation for the next 24 hours so that more people have the chance to configure the tactics.
Danilo Sousa
Age:28
.
Position: D R
.
Tackle: 98
Passing: 84
Shooting: 86
Speed: 90
Dribble: 84
Control: 81
Header: 80
Aggressiveness: 21
.
Asking 19M
.
Santiago Gaona
Age:28
Position: DM L
.
Tackle: 96
Passing: 87
Shooting: 78
Speed: 90
Dribble: 78
Control: 86
Header: 80
Aggressiveness: 57
.
Asking 15M
HUGE SALE AT EMPOLI !!! CHECK IT OUT.
Deals are welcome on all players for sale !!!!!
Supposing all teams start on group stage:
Hertha wins CL, by winning all games. pts = 175
For UEFA:
Team A winner (all wins) pts = 87.5
Team B runner up (all wins and 1 loss) pts = 81.25
Team C semifinals (all wins and 1 loss) pts = 71.875
Just a reminder, the country score is the average score of all its teams score (both from CL and UEFA Cup).
now just 45M …
Dont have enough money? contact me ingame for a deal …
.
Tomás Pedroso
27 years
Position: M / Side: L
.
Tackle: 89
Passing: 94
Shooting: 87
.
Speed: 90
Dribble: 79
Control: 86
Header: 80
Potentially speaking it always can. If Hertha potentially speaking win the cup with all wins (I don’t know how many pts that will be) it means that will twice the points of the winner of UEFA (who also potentially wins all games). It means the winner all of CL will basically win as many pts (by all chances more) as a country with three teams in UEFA. Does that seem fair to you?
Hertha wins CL, by winning all games. pts=???
Spain, for example, with three teams and their best possible performance in UEFA: total pts=
Team A winner (all wins) pts=
Team B runner up (all wins and 1 loss) pts=
Team C semifinals (all wins and 1 loss) pts=
can someone calculate the pts and see how they fair. Remember, for every 1 Uefa pts there are 2 CL pts
Dhimitri, how can germany benefit from only 1 team doing very good…rest of the countries will still get ALOT of points from uefa, while germany can only manage in cl with 1 team?
there should not be huge gap in point between CL and UEFA, or the respective Latin American cups, such as Vaugh proposes (2:1)
UEFA ratings, if nothing else, serves to reflect the strength of leagues. With Vaugh proposal, countries like Germany (a 1-2 teams league) would benefit too much. Benefiting from the new rating system, Hertha’s performances in CL would be enough to rank Gemrany higher in the overall ranking and gain extra European slots for German teams and for a league that don’t deserve. Teams from stronger leagues, will lose rights in CL and UEFA because of this.
If there will be changes, to reflect the difficulty levels between the two cups, then a 5:4 ratio would be enough. 2:1 will create artificial evaluations!
Filipe is right, don’t forget the National teams! :D
That would be to much competitions, and we must save a place for the National teams competitions :D
Regards
some players for sale @ juventus, also some nice loans for the smaller/beginning teams!
first half of the season is also cup games, that would rly affect the stamina to much for those teams….gogo world cup!
how about World cup instead of the CL/LB in the schedule (2nd half of season) AND CL/UEFA/etc. in the first half of the season – winners/top 8 of each competition qualify for world cup.
love it, you know it……. cant wait….
The different way I like most is replacing the existing international cups by a World Cup with 32 clubs from all over the world :)
Different way = different way to distribute the points.
Gabriel, it still making not much sense on the points.
Even thinking hypotetically that Argentina would have good teams, that would just make Argentina and Brazil dominate it. I believe there are two ways to balance it; european competitions pay better and points still the same… Or find a different way to balance the equation.
player name ? =)
You can post your sales in the sticky “For sale and for loan” right on top of the Fastticker toppic.
Regards
Well my players are not bad believe me. I think there is something wrong with the game evaluating teams quality. I shouldn’t be ranked so low in my division IMO.
90+ dribblers with 80 tackle won’t take the ball away from you, but yeah it’s hard to tackle them :) Isn’t that the meaning of dribble?
1 more – maybe it is better to decrease the awesomeness of the “dribbling” attribute ? At the moment it is very strong and if you have a squad with 90+ dribblers you can dominate the opponent. I think all attributes should be valued and if a team even has a very good dribbling squad, it should be possible to outplay them using long pass or speedy players or something else =)
players with only +90 main stat won’t win u matches. Secondary stats are also very importent. Defenders with passing and shooting above 85 is ofc nice, but remember that are worth quiet alot! Winning games is all about good player and good tactics. If your team only has the main skill, then i doubt u wont come far. The best player in game is ofc every skill on 100, but that won’t happen.
.
An for the midfield, if they tackle the opponent on the midfield then the defenders wil have less work to do. But can they get the ball in front to the attackers then? :)
After many seasons managing Gama i felt before the season finally i built a strong balanced team has matured with unique players that can dominate at least some games.
Well, my board expectation this season is to “stay in division”.
Yes, there are a lot of good teams in Brazil but i think there must be some decisive factors when the game engine analyses the quality of teams.
How important are the supporting skills?
Are defenders with good passing ability has impact on games?
Or midfielders with good tackling or shooting?
I play with four defenders with 90,86,84 and 81 passing. I have serious doubts having good passers in defense gives your team an edge.
My MA has 92 shooting 99 speed 96 dribbling and 96 heading scores only twice per season in 35+ league games.
How about having two 87 tackling players in midfield. Do they help your defending?
I started to think the game engine uses same kind of evaluation in the matches like in board expectations ignoring some key factors.
To be honest i really hate looking at the match reports to see inferior teams having more possession or better pass ratio or more chances.
Thanks for listening.
Guys there is a site that lets you visit long gone sites……
http://archive.org
use the waybackmachine box to search for sites.
if you go to managersim.com and then head into the last updated site you can access all non gameworld pages and ALL THE FORUM THREADS!!!
looks like i will be spending my night reading all those bloody things again!
http://web.archive.org/web/20070511005855/www.managersim.com/pub/pt_forumlist.php
@thorpedo, i’m going for the triple in my first season! cup/uefa/league !!! 1/3 completed!
ow yeah..grats to myself for my first title ever < 3