Recent Posts by Gabriel Cesario
4,174 posts(s) found
Just posted in the announcements forum, had to postpone the ticks due to some fixes I did last ninght.
Sorry, we missed two ticks due to some fixes I did last night. Back to normal now.
I don’t think they be added in Beta 1, but on the next dimension we create (if Beta 1 becomes full) or when we reset Beta 1, no estimate for that to happen yet.
Woodhead, is that you? :-)
Bug fixed, when you relog in you go to the enter dimension page instead of to the access denied page.
OOOhhhh, now I remembered! We haven’t thought of such a screen, probably because we didn’t use it much on MS. But if people miss it we can consider having it, or something similar.
We don’t disagree, we’ll add this as a low priority task ;-)
Maybe when we implement different ticket prices for different competitions and match importance we can take care of that. But if you think about it, if most managers take european teams and improve them, their countries will slowly develop (when we implement country development, of course) :-D
I’ve broken it in two lines guys, should have done that before!
You’re right, numbers are too close to each other…
Weird, if that is still happening let me know which player you’re talking about so I can take a look.
You may have already seen what happened on this long tick in the Announcements forum. Now that you’ve talked about tick duration, I’d like to tell you that all of our ticks have taken less than a minute, so if you see the game ticking for 5 minutes you can be sure something bad have happened.
I’ll reveal some numbers for you guys…english players’ skills should be 7 less than brazilian players’ skills, in the average. Don’t forget all players have some potential to grow, and that potential is country independent. If you’re lucky you can get a team full of very good english players :-)
Hope this kind of problem doesn’t happen during the weekend when our response time will almost certainly be longer :-)
As some of you may have noticed, the last tick didn’t run smoothly, so we had to run it manually and to make things worse, couldn’t reproduce the problem. You may have received duplicated messages and those who play on England second division will see that the round matches were played twice, but you’ll only know the result for the last one :-D
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Well, it’s like an email, why not have it :-)
I know, sometimes it’s just useless…
I was thinking about that yesterday, I didn’t remember if we added that to any screen. Now I have the answer :-)
Doesn’t the player profile had a link for you to buy him? Could you make an offer this way at least?
Good point Charles, I guess we shouldn’t allow that, even though it won’t cause any problems, the player will stick with the best offer anyway.
We don’t jhave strategies except for those on the right (passing style, shooting distance, and so on).
Hi Ali,
There are no rankings yet, but your situation may be one of the worse. I’ll see what I can do to restore at least some of your matches.
Cheers.
In a distant future maybe, we use a third party forum, no ideia how long it would take to have an in-game one :-)
As Danilo said, the league matches generation randomly decides if you’ll play home or away (of course you’ll always play against each team twice, one at home and one away), and in the average, the result is not that unbalanced. Even on MS sometimes I had 4 away matches in a row :-)
Cheers.
I agree Toni, as you said, we’ll find out how economy goes during Beta 1. To be honest, we did not test it intensively, so it may become unbalanced quickly.
The stadiums suggestion is interesting. Depending on our economy results we may use that or simply let everybody start with the same stadium size. First we have to figure out how stadium increasing will work.
I’m not sure I understood…if you want to see other team’s matches you have to go to that team’s screen and click on that page’s matches link, is that what you want? Are you suggesting a direct link to this page from somewhere else?
Cheers.
We should have hidden the side of the player everywhere, but we did that only on some places. Groover is right, no effect at all.
It will be implemented in the future, removed from Beta 1 plans in order to meet August deadline :D
Sounds good, not that hard to do.
I was planning to allow sorting on everything, but if many people think it will spoil the fun of finding good players I’ll reconsider and allow sorting on position only.
That’s strange, check on turn 10 if your balance changes. But be sure you’re not confused by what I said, the finances screen does not display what your balance was when you navigate through previous periods, we still have to implement that.