Recent Posts
18,555 posts(s) found
I bought Fábio Guedes yestarday because i needed another striker till the end of this season.
I payed 5,3m for him and i couldn’t have the player in my team because he was loan out to another club and i did know this rule.
No problem. I fired him now and another rich club will get him for sure… probably the club i bought him the first place.
i guess we dont need to tell you to fix the financial system :D <3
Hehe finaly Portugal has a chance to pass Spain :D I belive it will be this season, but if not it must be the next as the Spain will lose much more points than Portugal.
Things are very close for the second place, but the first continuous untouchable :D
I think in real life the player still stays in the loaner team till the end of loan contract.
In my opinion the best way is as it is now. The buyer knows the conditions he is buying, and so the loaner must know he can keep the player for the duration of the contract.
its between eggs and chickens…
well, according to my idea, in that case, you have to stick with him:) same for everyone else:) ( but we can have a clause in that case for players above 30)
what happens then if my best player is a 32 year old i cant get sold but i don’t wanne pay his wages anymore? You say i can’t fire him, tbh i think managers should have that freedom.
The problem Nirabdha is that other managers don’t accept the loan termination and it was not you who loan the player.
This is a trick solution.
In real life this don’t happens. If a club buy a player, the owner of the player decide if he want to loan him or not. It’s no FIFA or UEFA that decides were he will play.
My opinion is more radical that Philipp. For me if a manager buy a player he should be in his team after the deal is done. The end.
The crap conversation of rich clubs and poor clubs it’s bullshit.
If there were a certain number to transfer for season or a maximum to get free transfered players maybe poor clubs could get less poor.
i like the way it is right now… a buying manager knows before hand who is on loan and who is not… so, it is his decision to buy or not…
he can always request the loan termination … or look for other players…
A fair opinion from Philipp.
the owner of a player should be able to sell a player – if loaned out or not.
.
but the manager who uses the loaned player, should be given a “transmission time”.
.
When the deal is done (transfer is final, cash exchange) the player stays for additional 6 turns on his side, then he wents to the buying manager. 6 turns should be ok for rearrange the formations and looking out for new loans.
Aand how about an email explain the changing?
managers will still have 16 players to fool around with… and those 14 players will be the best players… you can sell them, but not fire…
it is not something for owners to do…
it is the job of that manager who is trying to buy a player…
hum… to avoid this situation why didn’t the owers of the game develop something to avoid selling loan out players????
We are trying to reach a less conservative approach here. We want you guys to really be the managers of your teams, and this is the kind of limitation that could spoil that. We have to find a balance between the limitations and the functionalities.
i don’t understand why seller should receive anything at all?? he is the one who is selling the player on loan…
And buyer is also aware that he is buying someone who is already on loan…
i approve the change… it is upto the manager to check who he is buying…
Terminate, but the seller should pay a fee.
Other (not good) option is to reduce to 12 turns the loan time
I don´t aprove this change.
Of course the loan should terminate.
This is something that was changed recently and is being subject to discussions, so I decided to open a specific topic about it. The idea of keeping the loan was introduced to protect smaller teams who rely on loans to be competitive. You may say it’s not fair for the team which is buying the player, but he knows the player is loaned and should expect the player to be available only when the loan ends.
What do you think, if a loaned player is sold to another team, should the loan be terminated?
Done.
Davison, I guess we don’t need to tell you again to be careful with your words, do we? ;)
No disrespect to Andy and Marc.
your andy olivers average is 86.42 and with a shooting ability of 91… Thats crappy in Spain. I have two strikers with 95 and 98 shooting with an average of 89 and 87 respectively and still i am finding it difficult to score.
it will be a miracle if your andy oliver scores more than 20 goals in spanish league, playing at A C 0 position in a team which plays from centre.
But i appreciate that you have been able to get the best out of him, albeit in a lesser league…
Current Players for Sale * not all transfer listed but msg me and i can adjust accordingly*
Team player page : http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/166
list of players i am willing to sell.
Strikers
Andy Oliver premier league top scorer
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/66248
Roberto Varela : 86 tackle 91, 92 shooting and speed high 80’s the rest
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/62975
Jeremy Flach 93 shooter 100 dribble
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/64889
Gary McLeod 19yr old 80 shooter
Defenders
Germano Valente
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/54692
Jacobo Monroy 19yr old 80 tackle
Midfielders
Andrea Sgrigna
Jorge Castro
Xavier Porta
write me a message for the players not transfer listed and i will put them up
im looking to sell at least 2-3 players but current squad limits prevent from fully listing everyone
crappy ? premier league top scorer for 5 seasons isnt crappy so stfu
danilo, i suggested before selecting a pool of 14 most valuable players which you cannot fire. may be we can also select a captain.
and it is also ironic that you can’t sell a player for less than X amount, but you can easily fire him paying some fees… correct this situation first…
mostly because cheaters love to enter a team and fire a lot of players – making it difficult for us to control the situation if we dont have enought time.
yah gab…. sorry for that… can we move this to FT???
I believe it’s important to have an option to cancel a loan. I took over my current team and really didnt need the loaned player. So I went against the contract (didnt play him) so I can get rid of him. Perhaps it’s not fair that way, but seriously why pay the high wage if I didnt need him? After all, I’m not the one who loaned him. My suggestion is, let there be a money penalty for canceling a contract. This would keep it fair for both sides. Much like there is a salary penalty when you fire a player, there should be one in regards to the loan.
We can only fire one player per turn now? Why so low? If I take over a team, I want to rebuild it… it’ll take forever to get rid of the overpaid garbage, maybe 3 players per turn?
Just a thought.
We are improving our anti-cheat tools. Fair play is very important to us, and we are going to do our best to keep our controls enough to eliminate most of the cheaters.