Recent Posts
18,555 posts(s) found
Levante VS Espanyol
1 × 1
4-5-1 formation 5-3-2
56% possession 44%
33 shots 10
32 shots on target 9
86% accurrate passes 87%
75% effective tackles 41%
5 corners 2
2 offsides 3
1 fouls 5
Considering the fact that Espanyol keeper had keeping skill of 84 speed 86 and overall average approx 84 and Levante had 32 shots on target and, please let me know what we should do to score… It is understandable if the keeper skill is good, you cannot score… but if you cannot score even when the keeper is bullshit, what is it that we can do to score :S
Oh, this is because Sidney Monteiro was put back on his original team, the way he was fired/let go was considered cheat.
Maybe you need to tell your strikers how a goal looks like and that they must put the ball in the goal and not give him to the opponent keeper… ;):p
I count the missed pts for fun. But it is distorting.
The 4 games vs Marseille and Brest are what bother me really
I had a similar hiccup with Lyon. They won 2-0 with shots 6-25 in my favor :D
If I would count the points of matches that I lost that way I also could be in the first 4 places. We have to live with it for the moment.
.
I also play with long shooting but I can’t make a goal. Look at my last match. 21 shots and 60% possesion and no victory even no tie.
1 × 0
3-4-3 formation 3-5-2
40% possession 60%
13 shots 24
11 shots on target 21
89% accurrate passes 90%
50% effective tackles 70%
6 corners 3
4 offsides 9
11 fouls 7
.
Seems like my new tactics don’t change much :s
Marseille 6 × 1 Valencienes
3-5-2 formation 4-4-2
55% possession 45%
20 shots 21
18 shots on target 17
83% accurrate passes 79%
45% effective tackles 60%
5 corners 6
3 offsides 5
5 fouls 4
Valencienes 3 × 3 Marseille
4-4-2 formation 3-5-2
57% possession 43%
41 shots 13
35 shots on target 11
89% accurrate passes 90%
73% effective tackles 37%
10 corners 0
5 offsides 6
3 fouls 6
Valencienes 1 × 1 Brest
4-4-2 formation 4-4-2
54% possession 46%
29 shots 14
23 shots on target 11
94% accurrate passes 82%
62% effective tackles 53%
9 corners 2
1 offsides 4
1 fouls 11
Brest 4 × 1 Valencienes
4-4-2 formation 4-4-2
47% possession 53%
17 shots 20
15 shots on target 17
91% accurrate passes 90%
52% effective tackles 58%
2 corners 3
4 offsides 5
9 fouls 10
Shots 92-55 in my favor (23-14 per game)
Tackle 63.25%-46.75 average per game my favors
Passing pretty much equal.
Possession much better 3 out of 4 times.
Goals: 6-14
Now
Valencieness has medium distance shooting
Marseille and Brest have long distance shooting (from looking at the replay)
Strikers shots:
43-35
Striker goals
5-12
They have better shooters, but both me strikers have 94 shooting and a lot secondaries to back it up.
They have better goalies, but I probably have the best D out of them
In MidTicker the problem is more obvious. 90+ shooters with secondaries worth for WWII veterans score plenty from long range.
It is a completely illogical outcome for various reasons:
1.Individual outplays teamwork
2.One dimensional player outplays multidimensional player
3.Long range shooting is more efficient than close range shooting (close or medium)
4.Tackling quality and volume matters close to nothing when in fact it should be a key factor in the game as it disrupts the opponents game play if successful. It throws the opponent team off balance. Neutralizes them!!!!
I can accept the two losses away, but I cannot accept the scores. I can accept the home tie with Brest, but never the one with Marseille where there was only one team in the field.
I cannot accept long distance shooting (1 goal every 4 shots) to be extremely prolific while medium distance (1 goal every 15 shots) is as prolific as a blind man
In addition:
Freak games for Valencieness
2-1 (8-22 shots)
2-2 (6-18 shots)
2-0 (6-25 shots)
0-1 (20-7 shots)
It’s 3 losses and 3 draws, all unjustified. 15 pts lost for nothing. Exactly the difference between the 6th place Valencieness and the 1st place Auxerre :D
Anyway, the whole point is that completely fixing the game engine is URGENT!!! :)
@Simon: just received it, thanks!
@Martins: yeah, we’ll figure that out ;)
@Davison: interesting suggestion, haven’t though about it before!
ever thought of using the league symbols
we use the real teams logos so why not the leagues as well
Hi
I thought too but look the mail i received:
Sidney Monteiro has rejected your contract proposal (wage: 30999, seasons: 1). He was hired by Náutico
And his present wage is 25315. So is it a bug?
need to put more teams to join the liberators, but no country will overtake Brazil in the ranking score.
Monaco 1 – 1 Sedan
4-4-2 formation 3-5-2
60% possession 40%
33 shots 6
26 shots on target 5
87% accurrate passes 96%
62% effective tackles 37%
10 corners 0
7 offsides 4
6 fouls 3
Gabriel, i will send you the info for Mexico they have 18 teams in Primera Division (1st division)
then there are 17 teams in Liga de Acenso (2nd division) that makes 35 teams by popularity we can take 2 teams from Liga de Acenso and place them in “Primera” to make 20 leaving Liga de Acenso with 15 all thats left is to get 5 popular teams from Segunda Division (which really is 3rd division) and place them on the Liga de Acenso. For the 20 teams
I have always said that there needs to be more nations from America to balance this game, and I think Mexico, and Chile aré great choices. Then there is USA, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador that are good choices as well
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/251
Several players on sale, great players who can help your team, do not miss this opportunity and make your purchase.
Ahh understood. In any case, it was a pleasure doing business with you.
No country is ready yet, but I’ll try to add at least one from Europe and one from South America.
because i will buy another player but other team buy him…
which will be the new countries available for the next season?
LOL!!! I just bought a fantastic keeper from you that meets your requirements…why sell him in the first place?
Hi all
I need a goalkeeper under 27 years old and with minimum handling 95 and speed 90 , i have 25M to spend .
It is the wage and the contract length, but the higher wage should always get the player according to the current rules.
If anybody wants to provide us with data and logos for USA and Mexico teams we can give it a try, for sure :)
what i would like to know is which is the criteria for the player to choose
a team. Because i was certain that the wage made the difference and now i realize that i was wrong.Anyone knows?
take a look at Sunderland
C can play in RC, albeit not in R :)
Sorry, Nirabdha, he is a “C” and I need a R or RC.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/54528
sebastião Aguiar
Posição: M
Lado: R
Guarda-Redes: 28
Desarme: 84
Passe: 94
Remate: 84
Velocidade: 85
Drible: 98
Controlo: 98
Cabeceamento: 100
Agressividade: 73
Condição: 86
Enzo Pinson
Atributos
Posição: M
Lado: C
Guarda-Redes: 26
Desarme: 71
Passe: 99
Remate: 65
Velocidade: 87
Drible: 79
Controlo: 77
Cabeceamento: 91
Agressividade: 69
Condição: 91
make a offer :)
thanks. Angelo looks interesting but I don’t have the money to buy him….so no solution I guess
Again i hate the idea of new countries!!!!!
First, it is just because empty league with no competition, where just a few managers build a good team (because they can use youngh formation and still beat so bad CPU teams) and be big in international competition…… just not fair to me.
Good competition its just a good fight…..
Anyway new countries i guess will be added, so in this case A MUST!!!!!! …..USA AND MEXICO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and please forget about swiss and other leagues…… we will find more new managers to join rubysoccer from this countries than from greece sweeden……. and so…. i like chile as well.