January 08, 2008 11:52
Ricardo Costa
130 posts(s)
|
Topic: Managers with -$0 Finances Bankrupcy is imho clearly the first one! :) The next could be objectives, have the board ask you for a specific league place, comparing your squad with the rest of your league. Something like “Win the title”, where you’d have to at least stay on the top 3, “Among the top” for at least 7th or 8th, or lets say international cups, “Middle in Table” for 7th-14th and “Avoid Relegation” for… guess! ;) Cheers. |
January 08, 2008 10:22
Gabriel Cesario
4,296 posts(s)
|
Topic: Managers with -$0 Finances Managers are not fired for going bankrupt yet. The only change recently made is that the system blocks an offer for a player not only if you don’t have the transfer value, but also if your money less the sum of your open proposals is not enough to pay the transfer value. For example, if you have 2.5M and have an offer for a 2M player you won’t be able to make another offer for a player being sold for more than 0.5M We need to work on reasons for firing managers, bankruptcy could be the first one :-) Cheers. |
January 08, 2008 08:13
mattyb
29 posts(s)
|
Topic: Managers with -$0 Finances I might have missed an announcement, but is it still the case that managers can spend $$$$$ on players wages and have negative finances, or has the game been changed so that bankrupt clubs fire the managers? |
September 05, 2007 15:02
Alexandre Fe...
223 posts(s)
|
Topic: Rubysoccer ? doesnt bother me ruby soccer or ruby manager, perhaps a poll? |
September 05, 2007 11:17
Luis Medeiros
10 posts(s)
|
Topic: Rubysoccer ? I agree. Down with soccer; I would name it ruby manager Congatulations for the excelent work done so far. Luís Medeiros |
September 05, 2007 11:08
Gabriel Cesario
4,296 posts(s)
|
Topic: Rubysoccer ? Do you prefer rubyfootball? rubymanager? What do you suggest :-) Thanks for offering the first year domain, if needed! |