January 29, 2008 10:01
|
Topic: Small Leagues vs. Big Leagues Here we have a hard decision Henrique. One possible solution would be make the competitions happen simultaneously during the whole season, with greater intervals between the rounds. We’ll study that possibility and see if it will fit well in our calendar. Cheers! |
January 01, 2008 16:47
|
Topic: Anti cheat protection Sorry JD, something seems to be wrong with some users, we’ll have to investigate that a little further. You may be able to negotiate with that player cause I have cleaned some records again, but there is no guarantee. We’ll keep an eye on your records while trying to figure out the problem. Cheers. |
January 01, 2008 16:34
|
Topic: Anti cheat protection Hi, went to double check … but no idea who that manager is. |
January 01, 2008 07:17
|
Topic: Anti cheat protection JD, is that player from a team managed by someone you know? |
January 01, 2008 06:06
|
Topic: Anti cheat protection Hi, I cannot still make an offer on the player. :( |
December 31, 2007 12:12
|
Topic: Anti cheat protection We’ve changed some infrastructure stuff last week and some users where mistakenly considered to be playing under the same network or computer. That was already fixed, but some records were still wrong in our database, I’ve deleted them now, so you should be able to make the offers now. Let us know if it happens again. Cheers. |
December 31, 2007 02:43
|
Topic: Anti cheat protection Hi, I was tring to make an offer on the following player, Fernando Sanchez Saez (atletic Bilbao) but got “stuck” with the following message: Prevented by anti-cheat protection. If you are not trying to cheat, contact admins. Can you please explain why ? My team is Maritimo from Portugal |
December 18, 2007 06:49
|
Topic: Good rule The limit is already 30 + 6 Amaral, 30 regular players + 6 youths :-) Cheers. |
December 18, 2007 04:18
|
Topic: Good rule 30 + 6 would also be my choice. 30 + 6, at least one more season. The limit of 30 players is messing the game. No one buys or sells. I think it would be fair to make this change (that i agree!) step by step. |
December 09, 2007 18:26
|
Topic: Good rule And let me support the 30+6 decision… My choice too… The ideal squad size to play 1 game per turn… Less would be difficult… |
December 09, 2007 17:52
|
Topic: Good rule In another topic I suggested: |
December 09, 2007 16:09
|
Topic: Good rule Fixed. |
December 09, 2007 13:35
|
Topic: Good rule I was wondering if I had covered those…that answers my question, thanks Henrique. |
December 09, 2007 08:30
|
Topic: Good rule I’m agree Gabriel, it’s just game |
December 09, 2007 06:46
|
Topic: Good rule Amaral: no, the same restriction applies to youth players, you can’t have more than 30 players in any situation. |
December 08, 2007 15:14
|
Topic: Good rule Question: giving contrats to youth players, when they ask, will be possible if the team is over 30 players? I agree with this new rule, even if it’s not very nice for me, but I think it would be fair to exclude contrating our youth players from that rule (the ones we had before the rule, obviously). |
December 08, 2007 08:24
|
Topic: Good rule Nice improvement! Congrats! |
December 08, 2007 07:22
|
Topic: Good rule RS keeps getting better and better! Thanks!! :) |
December 08, 2007 06:38
|
Topic: Good rule Done, limit of 30 non youth players per team. |
December 08, 2007 03:28
|
Topic: Good rule Yeah, I was not planning to allow more than 30 players, could be less also. But I think 30 would be a good start, excluding youths as you said. And I agree that if you can only sign a youth if you haven’t reached the limit. |
December 07, 2007 21:22
|
Topic: Good rule I think that the maximum number of players would be 30, not counting the youth players |
December 07, 2007 19:48
|
Topic: Good rule excellent rules! this brings responsability to the trading actions of all managers. I hope the “bankrupt” and “maximum number of players” comes in soon. |
December 07, 2007 15:45
|
Topic: Good rule Not yet, but there will be. |
December 07, 2007 14:22
|
Topic: Good rule Is there a maximum number of players per team too ? |
December 07, 2007 09:32
|
Topic: Good rule Nice! So than expeculations and exorbitall wages will stop! Cheers |
December 07, 2007 09:31
|
Topic: Good rule Pleased to read that!!! Thanks! |
December 07, 2007 09:17
|
Topic: Good rule It is working for all players, including those bought before the rule. If someone bought a player before the rule thinking about selling him just a few turns later I don’t see why the rule shouldn’t affect this player. Some other, including myself, have bought some players and regreted or found better ones a few turns later. Unfortunately we’ll also have to wait for the 72 turns before selling them. Cheers. |
December 07, 2007 07:44
|
Topic: Good rule It should be nice if the admins set this rule to work right now with all the players, including players bought before the rule. There are so many cow traders in Fast Ticker, it would be nice see them being punished in some way! |
December 07, 2007 06:45
|
Topic: Good rule I think it is a good rule, but it should obviously only work for players that were bought since you announced the change, not the ones we bought before… |
December 07, 2007 04:20
|
Topic: Good rule Not yet, but there will be. |