January 07, 2008 11:24
Samir Buchaim
55 posts(s)
|
Topic: clubs selling to I think the three turns period should start over if any parameter for sell/loan is changed. If the selling price changed , the loan period or the salary percent. It should stay on the list for 3 turns completely unchanged. |
January 07, 2008 11:17
Philipp Leibeck
387 posts(s)
|
Topic: clubs selling to understood, Gabriel. But what if: playe X is listed 2,95 turns for 20M (worth ~2M) and 5 minutes before 3 turns are over the seller lowers minimum to 1M. His friend enters 1M & the deal’s done. |
January 07, 2008 11:14
Alexandre Fe...
223 posts(s)
|
Topic: clubs selling to personally i think it should be at least 3 ticks in every situation, does not matter the time the players has been in transfer list. cheers |
January 07, 2008 11:03
Gabriel Cesario
4,296 posts(s)
|
Topic: clubs selling to I have just thought of another suggestion to this 3 ticks minimum. If you make a proposal to a player that has been in the transfer list for more than 3 turns things will work exactly as they are working now: if the player accept any proposal he will go be transfered during the tick. If there are proposals to a player who has been in the transfer list for less than 3 turns he there will be no reply on the proposals until 3 turns have passed since he was transfer listed. After that he will be transfered to the team who offered the best proposal or reply to all teams with a new proposal, if no proposal was accepted. That will we would prevent instant or “arranged” transfers, which I believe is the goal of this 3 ticks minimum discussion. What do you guys think? (Loans would be changed to work the same way also) |
January 07, 2008 09:09
Gabriel Cesario
4,296 posts(s)
|
Topic: Player attribute history Hotlists, hotlists…no, we didn’t have that on our list, but I’ve just added :-) Cheers. |
January 07, 2008 08:41
Philipp Leibeck
387 posts(s)
|
Topic: clubs selling to first the transfer listing time should be postponed – like i suggested in another thread ~3ticks minimum. i see a problem in your case, matty. what if someone bids on my players and i’m not online to check which bidders i wanna drop. like my “rival” bid just 1 minute before tick closing … therefore a block/boycott function would be still usefull. |
January 07, 2008 08:35
Philipp Leibeck
387 posts(s)
|
Topic: Player attribute history i agree. it should cost some effort yourself to have an advantage on information (like player imrovements). Not everything should be be tansparent/visualized out-of-the-box. |
January 07, 2008 07:49
Alexandre Fe...
223 posts(s)
|
Topic: Player attribute history i’m down with gabriel on this one! It would spoil the fun of the game! i think a good sugestion is the hotlist like we had in the old days back on ms so we can keep tracking the players ourselves! cheers |
January 07, 2008 05:25
Gabriel Cesario
4,296 posts(s)
|
Topic: Sent Messages We’d need to change the message system a little bit to implement that, as your sent messages would disappear when the other manager deleted them. Let’s see :-) Cheers. |
January 07, 2008 05:24
Gabriel Cesario
4,296 posts(s)
|
Topic: Player attribute history I think it wouldn’t be good if we had that. Not knowing how much a player has improved is part of the fun when you need to decide if a player is worth buying or selling. :-) Cheers. |
January 06, 2008 13:45
Gabriel Cesario
4,296 posts(s)
|
Topic: clubs selling to Doesn’t sound bad, I’ll discuss that with Danilo. Cheers. |
January 06, 2008 08:41
Philipp Leibeck
387 posts(s)
|
Topic: clubs selling to boycott: why not ? It’s like having rivals or “enemies” in RL … some clubs you just don’t like or you have made bad experiences with the other manager … but: you shouldn’t be allowed to blck more than, let’s say, 25% of all (not a.i. managed) clubs worldwide. |
January 06, 2008 06:39
Gabriel Cesario
4,296 posts(s)
|
Topic: clubs selling to Hmm, this is at the same time interesting and dangerous. Interesting because it makes sense not to sell your players to your greatest or direct opponents, but also people could use this feature to boycott a specific team. Maybe a simple condition like not selling to teams in the same division would be better. We’ll see. Cheers. |
January 06, 2008 05:24
Philipp Leibeck
387 posts(s)
|
Topic: clubs selling to My club in fast ticker (Hertha) sold 4 players to a minor club of my country. the first 3 transfers were ok for me, but i would have favoured the option not to sell the 4th player to the same club … i guess it would be nice to select for each player you put on the TL, if you offer him to (clubs from) all countries or just to some or exclude some clubs in special. |
January 05, 2008 03:15
Gabriel Cesario
4,296 posts(s)
|
Topic: Form Table Nice, the arrows were suggested by a friend of mine already, but I need to add it to our list so I don’t forget :-) |
January 04, 2008 12:55
Alexandre Fe...
223 posts(s)
|
Topic: Form Table i mentioned the performance chart like there was in managersim, not another division table like they said :) Hey gabriel one more thing, how about an arrow icon next to each team line in the division table (up, down, or still) to indicate to who’s seeing the division table which team moved up and down after the last game! you can see an example of what im trying to say here: http://www.zerozero.pt/show_edicao.php?id_edicao=1582 at your right, there are the mentioned arrows! :) cheers |
January 04, 2008 10:52
Gabriel Cesario
4,296 posts(s)
|
Topic: Form Table I like this one. Added to our list. I don’t remember if you mentioned that Alexandre, if you did I forgot to take a note. Lots of errors were happening by that time :-) Cheers. |
January 04, 2008 10:15
Alexandre Fe...
223 posts(s)
|
Topic: Form Table yeah it is great, i like it… MS used to have that in a performance chart with rows and columns and all. I think i might mentioned that already to gabriel in the begining of the game… cheers |