March 16, 2009 12:06
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion From Vaughn in the Improvements topic: |
March 09, 2009 11:49
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion You’re welcome DaMaGo :) |
March 08, 2009 23:08
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion - National teams? (probably already mentioned, but why not?) |
March 08, 2009 00:21
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion yeah please do! i think i made this suggestion already though. We need it!!!! |
March 07, 2009 07:22
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion Thank for the change in loan´s system. |
March 03, 2009 19:16
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion You’re right, Vaughn, so if the loaned player plays less than 35 minutes he is considered to have missed that match. |
March 03, 2009 17:04
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion official matches played are counted by minutes played? Cause players that are playing less then 35min won’t improve right? What the technical system on that? |
March 02, 2009 20:26
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion Matches missed due to red cards or injuries won’t count as missed official matches on loan clauses. ;) |
March 02, 2009 19:44
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion new loaning clauses: will matches that players misses due a red card suspension counted as a “1 missed official match”? It shouldnt be b/c it’s probably not the managers fault/will. |
February 21, 2009 06:28
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion thanks for the statistical computer… i hope i can use it more now… previous one wasn’t worth much… |
February 20, 2009 00:24
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion When you say back in the days, are you referring to SS/MS? Cause we’ve got the european name files from Peter Strand himself. Some of them have been modified to contain more realistic names. |
February 19, 2009 23:40
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion Back in the days…. yes back in the days, there were some strange Dutch names they got from a file. Btw, talking about improvements. I got into the UEFA Group Stage, I have no idea how I did it, but I’m there :) Nice, let’s go RED SOX, oops wrong game :-D |
February 18, 2009 11:11
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion AZ sounds good Hopjes. I got the names from a website but if you guys have any suggestions for more commonly used names just let us know ;) |
February 18, 2009 10:57
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion I won’t bite for any team, I’m like a sticker… Further I like to suggest “AZ” instead of “Alkmaar” or do you only know AZ by its city where it’s from ? |
February 14, 2009 19:46
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion Copied from the improvements topic: |
February 11, 2009 20:44
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion I started with the youth academy cause I’m afraid of superstar youths all over the world as we used to have. Let’s see how it goes, 19 should be fine as well. |
February 11, 2009 18:46
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion i would also recommend it to be till 19 years… |
February 11, 2009 17:14
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion Gabriel, Maybe this rule could be a little different, as some players ask for a contract a little earlier… Besides, sometimes is still difficult to decide if a player with 78 in a main stat will be a good player or not. Maybe this rule could be not for players in the youth academy, but for players until 19 or 20 years (maybe 20 is a little high, 19 should be better). |
February 11, 2009 16:04
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion youth player = player in the youth academy |
February 11, 2009 12:53
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion what’s the definition of youth players? (academy, >22yro, ..) |
February 11, 2009 12:22
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion I’d like to clarify the latest changes on youth improvement system. We have received some complaints that youths were improving too slow. In response to that we’ve changed the system to allow a faster improvement for youth players. |
January 30, 2009 13:30
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion No for the first question, yes for the second…to create balanced groups I ignored the teams countries for now to keep things simpler :D |
January 30, 2009 12:50
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion international group stages: superb! |
January 02, 2009 18:21
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion Forgot to mention in the players development announcement, all existing players that still have points to improve will need 30 experience points for the next improvement. Afterwards the new rules will apply. |
December 13, 2008 00:42
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion Deleted some posts from Dr.Gullit. He says he is not satisfied with the latest changes in the match engine. Dr.Guillit, feedback is always welcome, but 2 things: 1) do not post things on the [admins_only] forums. We could code something to simply block non-admins to post there, but we thought that asking would be enough in this “beginning”. Match engine changes are deeply necessary and we will continue to implement them. When something goes wrong, we will investigate and fix – and we count on you guys to help us finding the problems and potential improvements. cheers |
November 27, 2008 01:50
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion from amacb on improvements topic: Very nice upgrade thanks Hopefully one day i can put my name there :p |
October 18, 2008 10:31
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion You can but you need to go to your manager info page either by clicking in the My Profile icon or clicking your name in your home page. But I agree, we could have links to undo the application in more places. |
October 18, 2008 09:04
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion I post it here because it deals with the improvements in the game. |
October 15, 2008 08:32
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion Keepers value had always been a concern, usually they had high values as just a few skills were used in the calculation, now that we’ve changed that their value is pretty low. We’ll review each skill influence in the calculation, not only for keepers so I guess this is likely to change. Thanks, Jorge! |
October 15, 2008 06:50
|
Topic: Improvements Discussion Regarding the last changes in the value algorithm, i agree with the new formula except for goal keeper. My 90 keeping goalie is now quoted around 1,2 M… in my opinion, that’s not even close to his real value. |