Tem como repatriar os jogadores do corinthians sem esses jogadores acabou o time.
Valeu Gabriel

Não entendi… :(

good players were fired

im getting sick of this shit.

Returned the 3 most important ones, the manager fired them just before resigning…that’s ridiculous!

@Davison: I’m already sick, probably more than anyone else :(

We certainly need more restrictions to prevent situations like these and we’ll add them…first things first, match engine work will take some time.

im more sick of getting happy about free transfer only for you to do this shit.

and on top of it… now blackpool is in the run… so…ya thanks everyone for another non free transfer signing… cos we all know that blackpool is gonna get it.

revert 3 and not the others… k

I reverted the top players transfers, the ones indicated by the admin tools.

There is something wrong, does Almagro coach Davi Costa know what he is doing?

he just hired 5 players that were “fired” by Corinthians manager Danilo Stramazzi and he is just about to pay $977,730 in just those 5 players .

with a total of more than $1,220,000 in player salaries. considering that Davi Costa was just hired by Almagro in turn 98, i would say that this is a formula for failure, [a new coach] + [hiring 5 players with crazy wages] + [unstable market] + [unlucky season]+[etc…] + [etc…] = FAILURE

I am just saying that something needs to be done regarding players minimum and maximum transfer clause and individual player wages.

i think this is just stupid.

i never wish bad to nobody, but I know this team will have a new manager by next season.

also I think its strange that a brand new manager got the good players and an old manager all of the sudden disappeared.

top players
he just fired a fkn 95 save keeper ( signed by blackpool) with 85 pass and only 25 years old

WTF

if your going to revert any you have to revert all cos this is utter shite…

lack of consitancy …. whats the point in playing ?… this is bullshit

Hey Davidson, calm down man.

The game is for FREE, the admins are not earning anything from this game. By the way, here is the current financial situation ( http://www.rubysoccer.com/donations ).

They are paying for us to have some fun. They have work, family and everybody knows that they develop rubysoccer on their free time.

Most of the guys that complain all the time here don’t even help them to pay for the server. I’m not telling that you have to do it, but at least stop with this idiot behavior here on the forum.

If you’re not happy about the game, just leave. Stop with “this bullshit”.

Let’s just have some patience and help them to get rid of the cheaters, cause we all know that it’s consuming some precious time from the admins that could be developing new stuff for us.

Regards,

Gustavo.

Obrigado

Gabriel

fair enough… but if your going to reverse 3… why not all ?

doesnt make sense considering the players allowed to be free transferd were top quality….and young

I agree with you Davison, maybe reverting just 3 was not the best option, but giving the tools I have for doing that right now and the little time available this decision seemed to be ok. Improving the admin tools takes precious time but we know that needs to be done and will be done. In the meanwhile there are simpler restrictions we can add like not allowing a manager to fire more than 1 player per tick.

thats a good idea gabriel.

i believe that was the norm in Soccersim. Only 1 player firing per tick.

Exactly, that’s where the idea came from :D

how about limiting the amount of free transfers per 36 tick… to like 3

davison, if the manager has resources, he should be allowed to hire any number of players he wants… this is managerial game, and i hope it remains the same, i hope it does not become the military rule, where you have limits on everything…

funny to see Managersim already had this covered :)

sly… its an evolution:)

No, perhaps Managersim should have been the basis of it all, and it should have evolved from there :), All these evolutions as of now, are things managersim already had, but Parag, you wouldn’t know that….since you didn’t play that game….

max loaned out should be instilled

that same fkn player is now on loan with a ridiculous price

Funny you should say that. I believe managersim had a maximum of 5 or 6 loans TOPS…… :)

ya SS had 6 loant out players max (which is good in my opinion)

but i think it also had a max of 2 or 3 loant players per team correct?

well… we do have a limit on the number of players available for your first team… so, if you think you have extra players, u should be free to do that… if you can get more of your players play official games at other teams, thats better than playing friendlies at home club…

why do ppl insist on having rules for everything… why don’t you leave something for the market forces to balance…

yes there are some things which need to be mentioned in the rules…. but not everything…
for eg, rules on firing players should be there (because club has paid for those players in terms of wages and transfer fees), and moreover i don’t like the current rule which that you can fire your best player but u can’t put him on the transfer for a value lower than what board agrees.

@sly, making a base out of something that didn’t last long i think might not have been the best idea for developers ( i am not saying it didn’t last long because it was bad). but when u make something as a base, u get both the negative and positive things from it, and i feel the developers did right by taking only the positive things and not bringing in the negative things like too much restrictions on everything. And yes, there is no such thing as utopian game, where you get everything right at first place, and i like the way game is evolving… :)

k so you want to be able to exploit the holes in the game… we get it

please think before you speak

tell me what are the holes…
1) * being able to loan players, is that a hole? (you need to have minimum set of 14 players, enough check is already there)
2)* being able to hire players on free transfers, is that a hole? (who would not hire a free player. you will probably defer, because u cannot compete against blackpool and thats why you complain a lot)

i have said on countless occasions, the player firing system is ironical, since the board doesn’t allow to lower the price on transfer list but allows to fire?? (gab do something about this, or let the board decide the most important 14 players whom you cannot fire…)

well… i want these discussions to enhance ruby soccer, so, before implementing any regulations we need to know the merits and demerits of everything…

davison, i honestly ask you to list all the holes you have seen in the game, and lets discuss on those… and find out which are really holes and which are not…

your like talking to a brick wall

@Nirabdha: I agree when you say it doesn’t make sense if the board allows you to fire your player but not lower the price…picking the 14 that can’t be fired is an interesting idea, at least for start :)

davison… i asked you to suggest, not get personal… :)