Marseille 6 × 1 Valencienes
3-5-2 formation 4-4-2
55% possession 45%
20 shots 21
18 shots on target 17
83% accurrate passes 79%
45% effective tackles 60%
5 corners 6
3 offsides 5
5 fouls 4

Valencienes 3 × 3 Marseille

4-4-2 formation 3-5-2
57% possession 43%
41 shots 13
35 shots on target 11
89% accurrate passes 90%
73% effective tackles 37%
10 corners 0
5 offsides 6
3 fouls 6

Valencienes 1 × 1 Brest
4-4-2 formation 4-4-2
54% possession 46%
29 shots 14
23 shots on target 11
94% accurrate passes 82%
62% effective tackles 53%
9 corners 2
1 offsides 4
1 fouls 11

Brest 4 × 1 Valencienes

4-4-2 formation 4-4-2
47% possession 53%
17 shots 20
15 shots on target 17
91% accurrate passes 90%
52% effective tackles 58%
2 corners 3
4 offsides 5
9 fouls 10

Shots 92-55 in my favor (23-14 per game)
Tackle 63.25%-46.75 average per game my favors
Passing pretty much equal.
Possession much better 3 out of 4 times.
Goals: 6-14

Now
Valencieness has medium distance shooting
Marseille and Brest have long distance shooting (from looking at the replay)
Strikers shots:
43-35
Striker goals
5-12
They have better shooters, but both me strikers have 94 shooting and a lot secondaries to back it up.
They have better goalies, but I probably have the best D out of them

In MidTicker the problem is more obvious. 90+ shooters with secondaries worth for WWII veterans score plenty from long range.

It is a completely illogical outcome for various reasons:
1.Individual outplays teamwork
2.One dimensional player outplays multidimensional player
3.Long range shooting is more efficient than close range shooting (close or medium)
4.Tackling quality and volume matters close to nothing when in fact it should be a key factor in the game as it disrupts the opponents game play if successful. It throws the opponent team off balance. Neutralizes them!!!!

I can accept the two losses away, but I cannot accept the scores. I can accept the home tie with Brest, but never the one with Marseille where there was only one team in the field.
I cannot accept long distance shooting (1 goal every 4 shots) to be extremely prolific while medium distance (1 goal every 15 shots) is as prolific as a blind man

In addition:
Freak games for Valencieness
2-1 (8-22 shots)
2-2 (6-18 shots)
2-0 (6-25 shots)
0-1 (20-7 shots)

It’s 3 losses and 3 draws, all unjustified. 15 pts lost for nothing. Exactly the difference between the 6th place Valencieness and the 1st place Auxerre :D

Anyway, the whole point is that completely fixing the game engine is URGENT!!! :)

If I would count the points of matches that I lost that way I also could be in the first 4 places. We have to live with it for the moment.
.
I also play with long shooting but I can’t make a goal. Look at my last match. 21 shots and 60% possesion and no victory even no tie.

I count the missed pts for fun. But it is distorting.
The 4 games vs Marseille and Brest are what bother me really

I had a similar hiccup with Lyon. They won 2-0 with shots 6-25 in my favor :D

Maybe you need to tell your strikers how a goal looks like and that they must put the ball in the goal and not give him to the opponent keeper… ;):p

short distance shooting seems useless too…