I know there was also a little random factor in the player choosing it’s club, but this is kinda strange to me:

In medium ticker:
Wessel Schutte has rejected your contract proposal (wage: 10000, seasons: 1). He was hired by Bayer Leverkusen.

His new salary:
3-Turn Wage: $7,800
But for 3 seasons. So you might think he wants to choose for the 3 seasons because that would be better.

Then i have a other one for you in the same tick:
This time i offered a 3 season contract:

Poorter Soetaers has rejected your contract proposal (wage: 46536, seasons: 3). He was hired by Fiorentina.

Now this guy signs for a 1 year contract: 3-Turn Wage: $35,012

Perhaps someone could explain why?

Maybe it has something to do with your current squad of players? You already have 8 midfield players while i only had 5 prior to signing him. Hence, the player is more likely to choose for Fiorentina because he’s likely to get more playing time there.

Besides…Florence or Roosendaal, can’t blame the guy :)

When you are young you want to play in the best competition right?

Position Country Season 41 Season 42 Season 43 Season 44 Season 45 Total
1 Brazil Brazil 85.654 79.833 75.259 83.99 85.861 410.597
2 Portugal Portugal 51.351 68.918 65.765 71.621 68.725 326.38
3 England England 76.125 71.17 67.567 53.667 52.123 320.652
4 Argentina Argentina 65.356 66.338 68.55 63.39 55.036 318.67
5 Netherlands Netherlands 51.801 68.918 74.323 67.116 52.895 315.053
6 Italy Italy 56.756 52.509 49.549 65.765 69.368 293.947

OH….

And Roosendaal, my god have you seen the women there? The piggies in Florence can’t match that!

i agree is bullshit pisses me off everytime it happends to me sorry i would like to build a dynasty not be stopped by some bullshit rule in the code. realistic please

Halve_Tamme got it right, the player decision is based on salary and first team chance (or higher chance of getting playing time as he said).

Cheers