i doubt the calculation behind the players value. Because i have often players with similiar skills and big differences in their valuation.

my current example:
Sabiniano Huertas (tac-hea: 597)
D C 21
63 100 86 79 91 86 75 80 53
$46,062,787

vs.

Faouzi Allais (tac-hea: 594)
D L 22
46 100 80 72 90 86 86 80 49
$105,556,345

Similiar skills and even better sum of skills (keep, aggression left aside). and position flexibility for Huertas … but Allais is valued twice as much.

maybe control is a more expensive skill ?

Interesting, they have the same average regarding the value calculation. I see they were hired from free transfer, so no influence from transfer price. I can think of 2 explanations:

-the dynamic value calculation coefficients were higher when Allais improved than when Huertas improved
-Allais got lucky on Random effect during his value calculation

I’d guess it’s a little bit of both, but first option is more likely. Allais is 1 year older and prices have dropped a little, in general. Huertas value is close to the calculated value using the current coefficients.

Just an extra comment, this calculation doesn’t take side, aggressiveness or age in consideration, we’ll probably add these factors in the future.

Cheers!

The value system has changed but the clubs income stayed the same. This surely affects the game economy. Something to think about maybe.

The economy needs to be adjusted, that’s for sure, but I don’t feel the value system is responsible for that, as the idea is that it should regulate itself. Anyway, suggestions for game economy are always welcome (I know we already have some here in the forums :D )

Cheers!

My keeper in fastticker Borghi improves his skills of dribbling but his value decreases from 33M to 29M.
How does this come?

It happened to some of my players as well, I believe the general market value of players has decreased recently.